David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Indian Philosophy 36 (5-6):563-574 (2008)
This paper is devoted to theoretical and methodical considerations on our study and understanding of macroscopic transitions in the world of Sanskrit intellectuals from the sixteenth to the eighteenth century (cf. Pollock, Indian Economic and Social History Review 38(1):3–31, 2001). It is argued that compared to his immediate predecessors Bhaṭṭoji Dīkṣita’s contribution to Prakriyā grammars was modest. It was to a large extent on account of changed circumstances—over the centuries mainly a slow but steady decline—in the position of Sanskrit and the general public’s need for a simple definition of authoritatively correct Sanskrit that Bhaṭṭoji’s grammar met with success so quickly, so widely, and so solidly. I once knew a little boy in England who asked his father, “Do fathers always know more than sons?” and the father said “Yes.” The next question was, “Daddy, who invented the steam engine?” and the father said “James Watt.” And then the son came back with “But why didn’t James Watt’s father invent it?” Gregory Bateson (1972, p. 21)
|Keywords||Pāṇinian grammar Sanskrit grammarians History of science Sociology of science Pierre Bourdieu|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Pierre Bourdieu (1996). The Rules of Art: Genesis and Structure of the Literary Field. Polity Press.
Pierre Bourdieu & Priscilla Parkhurst Ferguson (1988). Flaubert's Point of View. Critical Inquiry 14 (3):539.
Johannes Bronkhorst (2005). Bhaṭṭoji Dīkṣita on sphoṭa. Journal of Indian Philosophy 33 (1).
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Johannes Bronkhorst (2008). Innovation in Seventeenth Century Grammatical Philosophy: Appearance or Reality? [REVIEW] Journal of Indian Philosophy 36 (5-6):543-550.
Mulakaluri Srimannarayana Murti (1974). Sanskrit Compounds: A Philosophical Study. Chowkhamba Sanskrit Series Office.
Michael Zammit (1996). He is You Are What I Am: From the Unique to the Universal. Asian Philosophy 6 (2):109 – 115.
Pushpendra Kumar & Dipti Sharma (eds.) (2008). Facets of Indian Heritage =. New Bharatiya Book Corp..
V. N. Jha (ed.) (2010). Language, Grammar, and Linguistics in Indian Tradition. Centre for Studies in Civilizations.
Vaman Mahadeo Kulkarni & S. Y. Wakankar (eds.) (2006). Vāmanavikrama: Research in Indological Studies: Prof. V.M. Kulkarni Felicitation Volume ; Vedic Literature, Classical Sanskrit Literature, Poetics, Grammar and Linguistics, Philosophy, and Religion, Prakrit and Jainism. [REVIEW] Bharatiya Kala Prakashan.
Banamālī Biśvāla (2007). A New Approach to Philosophy of Sanskrit Grammar. Padmaja Prakashan.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads12 ( #135,079 of 1,101,725 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #191,839 of 1,101,725 )
How can I increase my downloads?