Are elementary particles individuals? A critical appreciation of Steven French and Décio Krause's identity in physics: A historical, philosophical, and formal analysis
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Steven French and Décio Krause have written what bids fair to be, for years to come, the definitive philosophical treatment of the problem of the individuality of elementary particles in quantum mechanics and quantum field theory. The book begins with a long and dense argument for the view that elementary particles are most helpfully regarded as non-individuals, and it concludes with an earnest attempt to develop a formal apparatus for describing such non-individual entities better suited to the task than our customary set theory. Along the way one is treated to a compendious philosophical history of quantum statistics and a well-nigh exhaustive (I’m tempted to say, “exhausting”) analytical history of philosophical responses to the quantum theory’s prima facie challenge to classical notions of particle individuality. The book is also a salvo from the headquarters artillery company of the “pro” side in the contemporary structuralism wars, and an essay in metaphysical naturalism. Whew! There are too many places where the friendly critic wants to engage the argument, and few where the authors have not already anticipated such engagement. I take this as my excuse, then, for offering not any systematic response to the whole project, but just some questions and observations about several points that caught my attention.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Robert C. Hilborn & Candice L. Yuca (2002). Identical Particles in Quantum Mechanics Revisited. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 53 (3):355-389.
Newton C. A. da Costa & Décio Krause (1994). Schrödinger Logics. Studia Logica 53 (4):533 - 550.
Shaughan Lavine (1991). Is Quantum Mechanics an Atomistic Theory? Synthese 89 (2):253 - 271.
Katherine Hawley (2007). Review of Identity in Physics: A Historical, Philosophical, and Formal Analysis. [REVIEW] International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 21 (1):106-108.
Steven French & Décio Krause (1995). Vague Identity and Quantum Non-Individuality. Analysis 55 (1):20 - 26.
Steven French & Décio Krause (2003). Quantum Vagueness. Erkenntnis 59 (1):97 - 124.
Décio Krause & Steven French (1995). A Formal Framework for Quantum Non-Individuality. Synthese 102 (1):195 - 214.
J. C. Pniower (2008). Review: Steven French and Decio Krause: Identity in Physics: A Historical, Philosophical, and Formal Analysis. [REVIEW] Mind 117 (467):693-696.
Steven French (2006). Identity in Physics: A Historical, Philosophical, and Formal Analysis. Oxford University Press.
Newton C. A. Costa & Décio Krause (1994). Schrödinger Logics. Studia Logica 53 (4).
Added to index2009-04-25
Total downloads53 ( #36,284 of 1,410,463 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #32,644 of 1,410,463 )
How can I increase my downloads?