A new argument for consequentialism? A reply to Sinnott-Armstrong
Analysis 56 (2):111–115 (1996)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,705 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesWilliam G. Lycan (1999). It's Immaterial (a Reply to Sinnott-Armstrong). Philosophical Papers 28 (2):133-136.
Allan Gibbard (1993). Reply to Sinnott-Armstrong. Philosophical Studies 69 (2-3):315 - 327.
Peter Baumann (2008). Problems for Sinnott-Armstrong's Moral Contrastivism. Philosophical Quarterly 58 (232):463–470.
Jonathan Smith (2010). On Sinnott-Armstrong's Case Against Moral Intuitionism. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 13 (1).
Mark T. Nelson (2003). Sinnott–Armstrong's Moral Scepticism. Ratio 16 (1):63–82.
Walter Sinnott-Armstrong (2009). How Strong is This Obligation? An Argument for Consequentialism From Concomitant Variation. Analysis 69 (3):438-442.
Walter Sinnott-Armstrong (1992). An Argument for Consequentialism. Philosophical Perspectives 6:399-421.
Elizabeth Tropman (2011). Non-Inferential Moral Knowledge. Acta Analytica 26 (4):355-366.
Bart Streumer (2003). Does 'Ought' Conversationally Implicate 'Can'? European Journal of Philosophy 11 (2):219–228.
Walter Sinnott-Armstrong (2001). What is Consequentialism? A Reply to Howard-Snyder. Utilitas 13 (03):342-.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads57 ( #17,361 of 549,198 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,397 of 549,198 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
