A new argument for consequentialism? A reply to Sinnott-Armstrong

Analysis 56 (2):111-115 (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1093/analys/56.2.111

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

A new argument for consequentialism? A reply to Sinnott-Armstrong.Frances Howard-Snyder - 1996 - Analysis 56 (2):111–115.
What is Consequentialism? A Reply to Howard-Snyder.Walter Sinnott-Armstrong - 2001 - Utilitas 13 (3):342.
Does 'ought' conversationally implicate 'can'?Bart Streumer - 2003 - European Journal of Philosophy 11 (2):219–228.
Non-Inferential Moral Knowledge.Elizabeth Tropman - 2011 - Acta Analytica 26 (4):355-366.
An argument for consequentialism.Walter Sinnott-Armstrong - 1992 - Philosophical Perspectives 6:399-421.
Is Ethical Naturalism more Plausible than Supernaturalism? A Reply to Walter Sinnott-Armstrong.Matthew Flannagan - 2012 - Philo 15 (1):19-37.
Moral Intuitionism Defeated?Nathan Ballantyne & Joshua C. Thurow - 2013 - American Philosophical Quarterly 50 (4):411-422.
Sinnott–Armstrong's moral scepticism.Mark T. Nelson - 2003 - Ratio 16 (1):63–82.
Consequentialism.Walter Sinnott-Armstrong - 2019 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Do framing effects make moral intuitions unreliable?Joanna Demaree-Cotton - 2016 - Philosophical Psychology 29 (1):1-22.
Problems for Sinnott-Armstrong's moral contrastivism.Peter Baumann - 2008 - Philosophical Quarterly 58 (232):463–470.
Reply to Sinnott-Armstrong.Allan Gibbard - 1993 - Philosophical Studies 69 (2-3):315 - 327.
It's immaterial (a reply to Sinnott-armstrong).William G. Lycan - 1999 - Philosophical Papers 28 (2):133-136.
Reply to Sinnott-Armstrong.Judith Jarvis Thomson - 2003 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 41 (S1):92-94.
Review of Walter Sinnott-Armstrong (ed.), Moral Psychology, Volume 2: The Cognitive Science of Morality: Intuition and Diversity. [REVIEW]Christian Miller - 2009 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2009 (7).

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-04

Downloads
23 (#666,649)

6 months
2 (#1,240,909)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Frances Howard-Snyder
Western Washington University

Citations of this work

Consequentialism.Walter Sinnott-Armstrong - 2019 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Distinguishing agent-relativity from agent-neutrality.Matthew Hammerton - 2019 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 97 (2):239-250.
“Cannot” implies “not ought”.Frances Howard-Snyder - 2006 - Philosophical Studies 130 (2):233-246.
Agent-Relativity and the Foundations of Moral Theory.Matthew Hammerton - 2017 - Dissertation, Australian National University

Add more citations

References found in this work

An argument for consequentialism.Walter Sinnott-Armstrong - 1992 - Philosophical Perspectives 6:399-421.
The heart of consequentialism.Frances Howard-Snyder - 1994 - Philosophical Studies 76 (1):107 - 129.

Add more references