David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Synthese 83 (3):363 - 384 (1990)
Pierre Duhem's often unrecognized influence on twentieth-century philosophy of science is illustrated by an analysis of his significant if also largely unrecognized influence on Albert Einstein. Einstein's first acquaintance with Duhem's La Théorie physique, son objet et sa structure around 1909 is strongly suggested by his close personal and professional relationship with Duhem's German translator, Friedrich Adler. The central role of a Duhemian holistic, underdeterminationist variety of conventionalism in Einstein's thought is examined at length, with special emphasis on Einstein's deployment of Duhemian arguments in his debates with neo-Kantian interpreters of relativity and in his critique of the empiricist doctrines of theory testing advanced by Schlick, Reichenbach, and Carnap. Most striking is Einstein's 1949 criticism of the verificationist conception of meaning from a holistic point of view, anticipating by two years the rather similar, but more famous criticism advanced independently by Quine in Two Dogmas of Empiricism.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Rudolf Haller (1985). Der Erste Wiener Kreis. Erkenntnis 22 (1-3):341 - 358.
Rudolf Haller (1982). New Light on the Vienna Circle. The Monist 65 (1):25-37.
Klaus Hentschel (1988). Die Korrespondenz Duhem-Mach: Zur 'Modellbeladenheit' von Wissenschaftsgeschichte. Annals of Science 45 (1):73-91.
Otto Neurath (1932). Protokollsätze. Erkenntnis 3 (1):204-214.
Citations of this work BETA
Carlo Penco (2010). The Influence of Einstein on Wittgenstein's Philosophy. Philosophical Investigations 33 (4):360-379.
T. A. Ryckman (1994). Weyl, Reichenbach and the Epistemology of Geometry. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 25 (6):831-870.
Marco Giovanelli (2013). Talking at Cross-Purposes: How Einstein and the Logical Empiricists Never Agreed on What They Were Disagreeing About. Synthese 190 (17):3819-3863.
Marco Giovanelli (2013). The Forgotten Tradition: How the Logical Empiricists Missed the Philosophical Significance of the Work of Riemann, Christoffel and Ricci. Erkenntnis 78 (6):1219-1257.
Klaus Hentschel (1992). Einstein's Attitude Towards Experiments: Testing Relativity Theory 1907–1927. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 23 (4):593-624.
Similar books and articles
John F. Kiley (1970). Einstein and Aquinas: A Rapprochement. The Hague, Martinus Nijhoff.
Nicholas Maxwell (1993). Induction and Scientific Realism: Einstein Versus Van Fraassen Part Three: Einstein, Aim-Oriented Empiricism and the Discovery of Special and General Relativity. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 44 (2):275-305.
Yemima Ben-Menahem (2001). Convention: Poincaré and Some of His Critics. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 52 (3):471-513.
Adolf Grünbaum (1960). The Duhemian Argument. Philosophy of Science 27 (1):75-87.
Avshalom M. Adam (2000). Farewell to Certitude: Einstein's Novelty on Induction and Deduction, Fallibilism. [REVIEW] Journal for General Philosophy of Science 31 (1):19-37.
Gary Wedeking (1969). Duhem, Quine and Grünbaum on Falsification. Philosophy of Science 36 (4):375-380.
Richard M. Burian (1990). Maiocchi on Duhem, Howard on Duhem and Einstein: Historiographical Comments. Synthese 83 (3):401 - 408.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads37 ( #44,570 of 1,096,714 )
Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #24,955 of 1,096,714 )
How can I increase my downloads?