David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Social Epistemology 6 (2):109 – 163 (1992)
Abstract Terminology within the biological sciences gets its import not just from semantic meaning, but also from the way it functions within the rhetorics of the various disciplinary practices. The ?sociobiology? of human behavior inherits three distinct rhetorics from the genetic disciplines. Sociobiologists use population genetic, biometrical genetic, and molecular genetic rhetorics, without acknowledging the conceptual and experimental constraints that are assumed by geneticists. The eclectic blending of these three rhetorics obscures important differences of context and meaning. Sociobiologists use foundational terms in genetics, such as ?gene?, ?fitness?, ?evolution?, ?heritability?, ?trait? and ?polygenic inheritance?, in starkly different ways from geneticists, while basing their analysis of human behavior on the implied authority of genetics. As a free?floating ?gene talk? moves across different disciplinary contexts, and before different audiences, it takes the form of an over?simplified and misleading arch?determinism. The result is widespread application of vague, incomplete, and distorted biological theory. If most sociobiologists, do not deliberately promote biological determinism, still less a political agenda, there is ample evidence that they misconstrue the implications of the genetic language that they borrow
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Karl R. Popper (1989/2002). Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. Routledge.
Charles Darwin (2008). On the Origin of Species. Oxford University Press.
Edward O. Wilson, Arthur L. Caplan, Daniel G. Freedman & Michael Ruse (1982). On Human Nature. Ethics 92 (2):327-340.
Ernst Mayr (1963). Animal Species and Evolution. Belknap of Harvard University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Leah Ceccarelli (1995). A Rhetoric of Interdisciplinary Scientific Discourse: Textual Criticism of Dobzhansky's Genetics and the Origin of Species. Social Epistemology 9 (2):91 – 111.
Similar books and articles
Vanessa Lux (2008). The Concept of the Gene in Psychiatric Genetics and its Consequences for the Concept of Mental Illness. Poiesis and Praxis 6 (1-2):65-77.
James Miles (1998). Unnatural Selection. Philosophy 73 (4):593-608.
J. Richard Udry (1999). How to Alienate Your Natural Allies and Attract Your Enemies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):911-911.
Laurence Perbal (2013). The 'Warrior Gene' and the Mãori People: The Responsibility of the Geneticists. Bioethics 27 (7):382-387.
Daniel W. McShea (1992). Gene-Talk Talk About Sociobiology. Social Epistemology 6 (2):183 – 192.
Jonathan Michael Kaplan & Massimo Pigliucci (2001). Genes `For' Phenotypes: A Modern History View. Biology and Philosophy 16 (2):189--213.
Jason M. Byron (2005). Sociobiology. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
John Alcock (1999). The Myth of Genetic Determinism – Again. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):885-886.
Steven J. C. Gaulin (1986). A Logical Structure for Human Sociobiology. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1986:75 - 86.
Added to index2009-02-01
Total downloads6 ( #379,238 of 1,781,042 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #291,797 of 1,781,042 )
How can I increase my downloads?