|Abstract||Recent work on the evidential argument from evil offers us sundry considerations which are intended to weigh against this form of atheological arguments. By far the most provocative is that on a priori grounds alone, evil can be shown to be evidentially impotent. This astonishing thesis has been given a vigorous defense by Keith Yandell. In this paper, we shall measure the prospects for an a priori dismissal of evidential arguments from evil.|
|Keywords||argument from evil problem of evil theism atheism Keith Yandell|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
James Beebe (2008). BonJour's Arguments Against Skepticism About the "a Priori". Philosophical Studies 137 (2):243 - 267.
Daniel Howard-Snyder & Michael Bergmann (2003). Grounds for Belief in God Aside, Does Evil Make Atheism More Reasonable Than Theism? In Michael Peterson & Raymond Van Arrogan (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Religion. Blackwell.
Kirk K. Durston (2005). The Failure of Type-4 Arguments From Evil, in the Face of the Consequential Complexity of History. Philo 8 (2):109-122.
Michael Almeida (2004). The New Evidential Argument Defeated. Philo 7 (1):22-35.
Richard Otte (2000). Evidential Arguments From Evil. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 48 (1):1-10.
James A. Keller (1989). The Problem of Evil and the Attributes of God. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 26 (3):155 - 171.
Del Kiernan-Lewis (2007). Naturalism and the Problem of Evil. Philo 10 (2):125-135.
Michael J. Almeida & Graham Oppy (2003). Sceptical Theism and Evidential Arguments From Evil. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 81 (4):496 – 516.
Robert Bass (2011). Many Inscrutable Evils. Ars Disputandi 11:118-132.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads54 ( #18,844 of 549,119 )
Recent downloads (6 months)9 ( #7,802 of 549,119 )
How can I increase my downloads?