David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Criminal Law and Philosophy 7 (1):121-136 (2013)
The idea that victims of social injustice who commit crimes ought not to be subject to punishment has attracted serious attention in recent legal and political philosophy. R. A. Duff has argued, for example, a states that perpetrates social injustice lacks the standing to punish victims of such injustice who commit crimes. A crucial premiss in his argument concerns the fact that when courts in liberal society mete out legitimate criminal punishments, they are conceived as acting in the name of all citizens—on behalf of the whole political community. Resisting this premiss, Peter Chau has suggested that courts ought to be conceived as acting only in the name of “just citizens”: citizens who cannot be plausibly seen as having contributed to distributive injustice. When conceived in this way, Chau argues, courts can no longer plausibly be regarded as lacking standing to punish. This article uses the debate between Duff and Chau to explain why the question of whether to punish socially deprived offenders can only be answered adequately when connected to broader concerns of democratic theory. Specifically, it argues that Chau’s proposal is not available within the context of the kind of political community upon which (Duff rightly believes) a system of liberal criminal law depends for its justification and maintenance: a community in which citizens see the law as embodying shared norms whose specific demands they disagree about. State officials are morally permitted to see themselves as acting on behalf of a subset of the citizenry, I argue, only in circumstances of democratic crisis : circumstances in which a moral community can no longer be plausibly said to exist
|Keywords||Punishment Standing Social justice Democracy Liberalism|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
John Rawls (1993). Political Liberalism. Columbia University Press.
Robert Nozick (1974). Anarchy, State and Utopia. Basic Books.
J. Rawls (1995). Political Liberalism. Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 57 (3):596-598.
Brian Barry (2001). Culture and Equality: An Egalitarian Critique of Multiculturalism. Polity Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Gary Watson (2015). A Moral Predicament in the Criminal Law. Inquiry 58 (2):168-188.
Similar books and articles
Peter Chau (2012). Duff on the Legitimacy of Punishment of Socially Deprived Offenders. Criminal Law and Philosophy 6 (2):247-254.
Antony Duff (2003). Punishment, Communication and Community. In Derek Matravers & Jonathan E. Pike (eds.), Debates in Contemporary Political Philosophy: An Anthology. Routledge, in Association with the Open University
Zachary Hoskins (2011). ''Deterrent Punishment and Respect for Persons''. Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law 8 (2):369-384.
Matt Matravers (2006). ‘Who’s Still Standing?’ a Comment on Antony Duff’s Preconditions of Criminal Liability. Journal of Moral Philosophy 3 (3):320-330.
Jules Holroyd (2010). Punishment and Justice. Social Theory and Practice 36 (1):78-111.
Kimberley Brownlee (2008). Justifying Punishment: A Response to Douglas Husak. [REVIEW] Criminal Law and Philosophy 2 (2):123-129.
Zachary Hoskins (2011). ''Fair Play, Political Obligation, and Punishment''. Criminal Law and Philosophy 5 (1):53-71.
Kevin Magill (1998). The Idea of a Justification for Punishment. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 1 (1):86-101.
René Foqué (2008). Criminal Justice in a Democracy: Towards a Relational Conception of Criminal Law and Punishment. [REVIEW] Criminal Law and Philosophy 2 (3):207-227.
Corey Brettschneider (2007). The Rights of the Guilty. Political Theory 35 (2):175-199.
Christopher Ciocchetti (2004). Punishment, Reintegration, and Atypical Victims. Criminal Justice Ethics 23 (2):25-38.
Christopher Bennett (2001). Punishment, Moral Community and Moral Argument: A Review of R.A. Duff,Punishment, Communication and Communityand Matt Matravers,Justice and Punishment: The Rationale of Coercion. [REVIEW] Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 4 (3):101-119.
L. R. (2001). The Disenfranchisement of Felons. Law and Philosophy 20 (6):553-580.
Bill Wringe (2010). War Crimes and Expressive Theories of Punishment: Communication or Denunciation? Res Publica 16 (2):119-133.
Thaddeus Metz (2009). Censure Theory Still Best Accounts for Punishment of the Guilty: Reply to Montague. Philosophia 37 (1):113-23.
Added to index2012-08-08
Total downloads22 ( #130,611 of 1,725,631 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #211,030 of 1,725,631 )
How can I increase my downloads?