David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophical Investigations 30 (1):3–24 (2007)
It is generally considered the case that an authorial preface is an author’s opportunity to give the reader a hand in interpreting the work he or she is about to read. It is strange then that the Preface to Wittgenstein’s Tractatus (1922) has often been overlooked. Max Black’s (1964) inﬂuential A Companion toWittgenstein’sTractatus, for example, passes over the Preface in silence. And even in the latest published edition of the so-called Prototractatus (1996), the Preface is the only part that appears in hand-written facsimile but is not reproduced in typescript form. Perhaps an argument for not so-reproducing the Preface of the Pro- totractatus in typescript is also an argument for the importance of the Preface: not one letter of this early hand-written text of the Preface is different from the ﬁnal published edition (I will return to this later). Only of late has the Preface to the Tractatus been seen as having any kind of focal importance.This recent interest in the Preface has largely been spawned by Cora Diamond’s and James Conant’s “New” view of Wittgenstein. This New view (designated as such subsequent to the publication in 2000 of the volume entitled The New Wittgenstein) uses the Preface as a central interpretive tool that, according to this view, shows that the Tractatus takes “a strong anti-metaphysical stand” which is “most explicit in Wittgenstein’s statements in the book’s Preface and concluding remarks.1”The third and fourth paragraphs of the Preface are seen as especially revealing of Wittgenstein’s anti-metaphysical purpose
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
John L. Pollock (1986). The Paradox of the Preface. Philosophy of Science 53 (2):246-258.
Richard Clifford Tute (1945/1973). After Materialism--What? Freeport, N.Y.,Books for Libraries Press.
Dawn M. Phillips (2006). Clear as Mud. Journal of Philosophical Research 31:277-294.
Immanuel Kant (1974). Preface to the First Edition of the Critique of Pure Reason ; Preface to the Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics ; Preface to the Second Edition of the Critique of Pure Reason. In Houston Peterson (ed.), Essays in Philosophy: From David Hume to George Santayana. Pocket Books.
Nikolay Milkov (2003). The Method of the Tractatus. Contributions of the Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society 11:139-41.
Logi Gunnarsson (2001). Climbing Up the Ladder. Journal of Philosophical Research 26:229-286.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads18 ( #92,606 of 1,100,992 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #290,337 of 1,100,992 )
How can I increase my downloads?