The need for interdisciplinary dialogue in developing ethical approaches to neuroeducational research
Graduate studies at Western
Neuroethics 5 (2):119-134 (2012)
|Abstract||This paper argues that many ethical issues in neuroeducational research cannot be appropriately addressed using the principles and guidance available in one of these areas alone, or by applying these in simple combination. Instead, interdisciplinary and public dialogue will be required to develop appropriate normative principles. In developing this argument, it examines neuroscientific and educational perspectives within three broad categories of ethical issue arising at the interface of cognitive neuroscience and education: issues regarding the carrying out of interdisciplinary research, the scrutiny and communication of findings and concepts, and the application of research and associated issues of policy likely to arise in the future. To help highlight the need for interdisciplinary and public discussion, we also report the opinions of a group of educators (comprising trainee teachers, teachers and head teachers) on the neuroeducational ethics of cognitive enhancing drugs, infant screening, genetic profiling and animal research.|
|Keywords||Educational neuroscience Neuroeducational research Education Cognitive enhancing drugs Infant screening Genetic profiling Animal research|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Paul A. Howard-Jones (2011). A Multiperspective Approach to Neuroeducational Research. Educational Philosophy and Theory 43 (1):24-30.
Paul Cloke, Phil Cooke, Jerry Cursons, Paul Milbourne & Rebekah Widdowfield (2000). Ethics, Reflexivity and Research: Encounters with Homeless People. Ethics, Place and Environment 3 (2):133 – 154.
Paul Cloke, Phil Cooke, Jenny Cursons, Paul Milbourne & Rebekah Widdowfield (2000). Ethics, Place and Environment, Reflexivity and Research: Encounters with Homeless People. Philosophy and Geography 3 (2):133 – 154.
Robert Frodeman (ed.) (2010). The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity. Oxford University Press.
Jorge Luis Nicolas Audy & Marília Morosini (eds.) (2007). Innovation and Interdisciplinarity in the University =. Edipucrs.
Joan E. Sieber (2008). Empirical Research on Ethical Issues in Pediatric Research. Ethics and Behavior 18 (2 & 3):127 – 138.
Mathias M. Siems, The Taxonomy of Interdisciplinary Legal Research: Finding the Way Out of the Desert.
Michael Decker (2004). The Role of Ethics in Interdisciplinary Technology Assessment. Poiesis and Praxis 2 (s 2-3):139-156.
E. Dye Danielle, Beverley McNamara Leanne Youngs & Peter O.’Leary Jack Goldblatt (2010). The Disclosure of Genetic Information: A Human Research Ethics Perspective. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 7 (1).
Elyn R. Saks, Dilip V. Jeste, Eric Granholm, Barton W. Palmer & Lawrence Schneiderman (2002). Ethical Issues in Psychosocial Interventions Research Involving Controls. Ethics and Behavior 12 (1):87 – 101.
Anna Goppel & Anne Schwenkenbecher (2012). Philosophy and International Law: Reflections on Interdisciplinary Research Into Terrorism. Ancilla Iuris 111.
R. J. Gatchel, Colin Allen & P. N. Fuchs (2006). Ethical Issues in Chronic Pain Research. In B. L. Gant & M. E. Schatman (eds.), Ethical Issues in Chronic Pain Management.
William E. Smythe & Maureen J. Murray (2000). Owning the Story: Ethical Considerations in Narrative Research. Ethics and Behavior 10 (4):311 – 336.
Added to index2011-02-19
Total downloads14 ( #90,533 of 739,315 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,243 of 739,315 )
How can I increase my downloads?