Topics in Cognitive Science 4 (1):84-86 (2012)
|Abstract||Stephen and Van Orden (this issue) propose that there is a complex system approach to cognitive science, and collectively the authors of the papers presented in this issue believe that this approach provides the means to drive a revolution in the science of the mind. Unfortunately, however illuminating, this explanation is absent and hyperbole is all too extensive. In contrast, I argue (1) that dynamic systems theory is not new to cognitive science and does not provide a basis for a revolution, (2) it is not necessary to reject cognitive science in order to explain the constraints imposed by the body and the environment, (3) it is not necessary, as Silberstein and Chemero (this issue) appear to do, to reject cognitive science in order to explain consciousness, and (4) our understanding of pragmatics is not advanced by Gibbs and Van Orden‘s (this issue) “self-organized criticality”.? Any debate about the future of cognitive science could usefully focus on predictive adequacy. Unfortunately, this is not the approach taken by the authors of this issue|
|Keywords||Computational theory Dynamic systems Emergence Prediction Embodiment Useful theory|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Iris van Rooij (2012). Self-Organization Takes Time Too. Topics in Cognitive Science 4 (1):63-71.
Guy van Orden & Damian G. Stephen (2012). Is Cognitive Science Usefully Cast as Complexity Science? Topics in Cognitive Science 4 (1):3-6.
Chris Eliasmith (2012). The Complex Systems Approach: Rhetoric or Revolution. Topics in Cognitive Science 4 (1):72-77.
Michael Silberstein & Anthony Chemero (2012). Complexity and Extended Phenomenological‐Cognitive Systems. Topics in Cognitive Science 4 (1):35-50.
Damian G. Stephen & Guy van Orden (2012). Searching for General Principles in Cognitive Performance: Reply to Commentators. Topics in Cognitive Science 4 (1):94-102.
Tony Chemero & Michael Silberstein (2008). After the Philosophy of Mind: Replacing Scholasticism with Science. Philosophy of Science 75 (1):1-27.
Michael Silberstein & Anthony Chemero (web). After Philosophy of Mind: Replacing Scholasticism with Science. Philosophy of Science.
K. Brad Wray (2010). Selection and Predictive Success. Erkenntnis 72 (3):365 - 377.
Raymond W. Gibbs & Guy van Orden (2012). Pragmatic Choice in Conversation. Topics in Cognitive Science 4 (1):7-20.
Dedre Gentner (2010). Psychology in Cognitive Science: 1978–2038. Topics in Cognitive Science 2 (3):328-344.
Nigel Stepp, Anthony Chemero & Michael T. Turvey (2011). Philosophy for the Rest of Cognitive Science. Topics in Cognitive Science 3 (2):425-437.
Rick Dale, Eric Dietrich & Anthony Chemero (2009). Explanatory Pluralism in Cognitive Science. Cognitive Science 33 (2):739-742.
Mog Stapleton (2013). Steps to a "Properly Embodied" Cognitive Science. Cognitive Systems Research 22 (June):1-11.
Alison Gopnik (1997). The Scientist as Child. Philosophy of Science 63 (4):485-514.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2012-01-18
Total downloads2 ( #245,680 of 722,748 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?