Vicarious Pain and Genuine Pleasure: Some Reflections on Spectator Transformation of Meaning in Sport
In Heather Sheridan Leslie A. Howe & Keith Thompson (eds.), Sporting Reflections: Some Philosophical Perspectives. Meyer & Meyer Sport (2007)
| Abstract | Ambiguity in the athlete’s perception and description of pain that opens the door to a series of reinterpretations of athletic experience and events that argue the development of an increasingly inauthentic relation to self and others on the part of those who consume performance as third parties (spectators) and ultimately those who produce it first hand (athletes). The insertion of the spectator into the sport situation as a consumer of the athlete’s activity and the preference given to spectator interpretation shift control of meaning away from the athlete and encourage a demand for athlete suffering in aid of the spectator’s own need for meaning. Through discussions of the function of narrative in sport spectacle, the witnessing role of spectators, and the phenomenon of vicarious substitution, I discuss the representation of the athlete as a character ideal and moral exemplar. At a more developed level of external interpretation, the athlete (or team) becomes the champion of the spectator, the role model or focal point of civic pride whose victory asserts the ascendence of my team and town over yours; and finally, the athlete or team is the intentional object of fan identification: my team is me. I conclude that the existential commitment of the spectator as devoted fan is an inauthentic one. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,705 |
| External links | This entry has no external links. Add one. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Leslie A. Howe (2007). Play, Performance, and the Docile Athlete. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 1 (1):47 – 57.
Leslie A. Howe (2011). Convention, Audience, and Narrative: Which Play is the Thing? Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 38 (2):135-148.
Michael W. Austin (2009). Magnanimity, Athletic Excellence, and Performance-Enhancing Drugs. Journal of Applied Philosophy 26 (1):46-53.
Masami Sekine & Takayuki Hata (2008). Modern Sport as an Opportunity to Form a Sense of Self. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 47:35-43.
Lynley Anderson (2007). Doctoring Risk: Responding to Risk-Taking in Athletes. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 1 (2):119 – 134.
S. P. Morris (2012). The Limit of Spectator Interaction. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 6 (1):46-60.
Margrethe Bruun Vaage (2008). Noël Carroll and the Role of Empathy in Fiction Film Engagement. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 1:263-269.
Yi Wang & Fu Xiaowei (2008). Is the Unity of Goodness and Beauty the Feature of the Confucian Aesthetics? Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 1:273-281.
Thomas Søbirk Petersen (2010). Good Athlete - Bad Athlete? On the 'Role-Model Argument' for Banning Performance-Enhancing Drugs. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 4 (3):332-340.
J. S. Russell (2012). The Ideal Fan or Good Fans? Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 6 (1):16-30.
Michael Burke (2004). What Would Happen If a 'Woman' Outpaced the Winner of the Gold Medal in the 'Men's' One Hundred Meters? Philosophy in the Contemporary World 11 (1):35-43.
Carl Thomen (2011). Sublime Kinetic Melody: Kelly Slater and the Extreme Spectator. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 4 (3):319-331.
João Tiago Lima (2012). The Competitive Perception. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 6 (1):61-66.
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2011-01-21Total downloads0Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |

