Journal of the Philosophy of History 2 (3):276-294 (2008)
|Abstract||This paper explains the genealogical method as it is understood and employed in contemporary Continental philosophy. Using a pair of terms from Bernard Williams, genealogy is contrasted with phenomenology as an `unmasking' as opposed to a `vindicatory' method. The genealogical method is also compared with the method of Ideologiekritik and recent critical theory. Although genealogy is usually thought to be allergic to universals, in fact Foucault, Derrida, and Bourdieu do not shun universals, even if they approach them with caution. The conclusion is that genealogy is a viable and productive approach to social criticism and self-transformation.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Colin Koopman (2008). Foucault's Historiographical Expansion: Adding Genealogy to Archaeology. Journal of the Philosophy of History 2 (3):338-362.
Brian Epstein (2010). History and the Critique of Social Concepts. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 40 (1):3-29.
Samantha Ashenden & David Owen (eds.) (1999). Foucault Contra Habermas: Recasting the Dialogue Between Genealogy and Critical Theory. Sage.
Yvonne Sherratt (2006). Continental Philosophy of Social Science: Hermeneutics, Genealogy, Critical Theory. Cambridge University Press.
Brian Lightbody (2010). Philosophical Genealogy: An Epistemological Reconstruction of Nietzsche and Foucault's Genealogical Method,Volume One. Peter Lang.
Tyler Krupp (2008). Genealogy as Critique? Journal of the Philosophy of History 2 (3):315-337.
Fred Evans (2001). Genealogy and the Problem of Affirmation in Nietzsche, Foucault and Bakhtin. Philosophy and Social Criticism 27 (3):41-65.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads74 ( #11,168 of 549,754 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,450 of 549,754 )
How can I increase my downloads?