David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Current Wittgenstein scholarship is marked by a striking discrepancy. The Bergen electronic edition, which has been published starting in 1998, is now completed and has dramatically changed the field of Wittgenstein philology. Wittgenstein's entire writings are available in easily accessible facsimiles as well as in carefully prepared diplomatic and normalized transcriptions. This is nothing less than a quantum leap for anyone involved in going beyond the surface of the volumes published from the "Nachlass" by the Trustees, some of which have been shown to require philological revision. The search facilities included in the Bergen edition are unique in providing almost instant access to all the data parsed by arbitrary queries. The very scope of the enterprise, offering a comprehensive, multi-layered digital rendition of the Wittgenstein corpus goes far beyond anything we can expect from traditional editions, including Michael Nedo's "WienerAusgabe", in our lifetime. And yet -- this is the discrepancy alluded to -- a significant number of recent books on Wittgenstein does not even mention the Bergen edition. "The New Wittgenstein", a collection of essays published in 2000 contains a bibliography faithfully reproducing all "primary sources", but lacking any reference to the digitized Nachlass. "Wittgenstein in America", a prestigious collection from 2001 -- ironically published by Oxford University Press -- does not do better and the same situation holds for the German language literature. To pick just two examples: neither Eike von Savigny's reader on the "Philosophische Untersuchungen", nor Wilhelm Vossenkuhl's corresponding volume on the "Tractatus" contain any pointer to the Bergen project. Something strange is, clearly, going on here.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Joachim Schulte (2003). Wittgenstein's Nachlass: The Bergen Electronic Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000. Grazer Philosophische Studien 65 (1):237-246.
David G. Stern (2010). Review Article: The Bergen Electronic Edition of Wittgenstein's Nachlass. European Journal of Philosophy 18 (3):455-467.
Nuno Venturinha (ed.) (2010). Wittgenstein After His Nachlass. Palgrave Macmillan.
Anthony Kenny (2006). Wittgenstein. Blackwell Pub..
David G. Stern (1994). The Wittgenstein Papers as Text and Hypertext: Cambridge, Bergen, and Beyond. In Kjell Johannessen (ed.), Wittgenstein and Norway. Solum Press
Bruce Howes (2007). "Rethinking" the Preface of the Tractatus. Philosophical Investigations 30 (1):3–24.
Gerhard Gelbmann, Report on the Project: Recollection of References. Wittgenstein on the Language-Game of Remembering. (RR).
Richard Raatzsch (1994). Das Wittgenstein-Archiv der Universität Bergen. Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 48 (1):139 - 142.
Ludwig Wittgenstein (2005). The Big Typescript, Ts. 213. Blackwell Pub..
Richard Alston (2000). T. Eide, T. Hägg, R. H. Pierce, L. Török (Edd.): Fontes Historiae Nubiorum, Vol. III. Textual Sources for the History of the Middle Nile Region Between the Eighth Century BC and the Sixth Century AD: From the First to the Sixth Century AD . Pp. 751–1216. Bergen: University of Bergen, 1998. Paper, NOK 220. ISBN: 82-91626-07-. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 50 (01):347-.
P. M. S. Hacker (1986). Insight and Illusion: Themes in the Philosophy of Wittgenstein. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2010-11-17
Total downloads17 ( #204,157 of 1,790,232 )
Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #105,905 of 1,790,232 )
How can I increase my downloads?