Prior's defence of Hintikka's theorem. A discussion of Prior's 'The logic of obligation and the obligations of the logician'
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Synthese 188 (3):449-454 (2012)
In his paper, The logic of obligation and the obligations of the logician, A.N. Prior considers Hintikka's theorem, according to which a statement cannot be both impossible and permissible. This theorem has been seen as problematic for the very idea of a logic of obligation. However, Prior rejects the view that the logic of obligation cannot be formalised. He sees this resistance against such a view as an important part of what could be called the obligation of the logician. Prior argues that Hintikka's theorem should not be seen as something paradoxical. On the contrary, it should be seen as a fully acceptable consequence of a basic and reasonable assumption in deontic logic, namely Hintikka's rule
|Keywords||Obligation Deontic logic Hintikka’s theorem|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Arthur N. Prior (1962). Formal Logic. Oxford, Clarendon Press.
A. N. Prior (1956). Modality and Quantification in S. Journal of Symbolic Logic 21 (1):60-62.
Citations of this work BETA
Anne Gerdes & Peter Øhrstrøm (2015). Issues in Robot Ethics Seen Through the Lens of a Moral Turing Test. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 13 (2):98-109.
Per Hasle & Peter Øhrstrøm (forthcoming). Prior’s Paradigm for the Study of Time and its Methodological Motivation. Synthese:1-16.
Similar books and articles
A. N. Prior (2012). The Logic of Obligation and the Obligations of the Logician. Synthese 188 (3):423-448.
Max Cresswell (2013). Axiomatising the Prior Future in Predicate Logic. Logica Universalis 7 (1):87-101.
A. N. Prior (2003). Papers on Time and Tense. Oxford University Press.
B. Jack Copeland (2006). Meredith, Prior, and the History of Possible Worlds Semantics. Synthese 150 (3):373 - 397.
Richard Swinburne (2008). Bayes's Theorem. Gogoa 8 (1):138.
Patrick Blackburn (2006). Arthur Prior and Hybrid Logic. Synthese 150 (3):329 - 372.
Christopher Menzel (1991). The True Modal Logic. Journal of Philosophical Logic 20 (4):331 - 374.
Michael Grimshaw (2002). The Prior Prior: Neglected Early Writings of Arthur N. Prior. Heythrop Journal 43 (4):480–495.
Lloyd Humberstone (2005). For Want of an 'And': A Puzzle About Non-Conservative Extension. History and Philosophy of Logic 26 (3):229-266.
Peter Simons (2006). The Logic of Location. Synthese 150 (3):443 - 458.
Mary Prior & Arthur Prior (1955). Erotetic Logic. Philosophical Review 64 (1):43-59.
C. J. F. Williams (1977). Papers in Logic and Ethics by A. N. Prior: The Doctrine of Propositions and Terms by A. N. Prior. Philosophical Books 18 (2):95-96.
Tomasz Jarmużek & Andrzej Pietruszczak (2009). The Tense Logic for Master Argument in Prior's Reconstruction. Studia Logica 92 (1):85 - 108.
Peter Øhrstrøm & Per Hasle (1993). A. N. Prior's Rediscovery of Tense Logic. Erkenntnis 39 (1):23 - 50.
Nellie Wieland (2011). Parental Obligation. Utilitas 23 (03):249-267.
Added to index2012-10-09
Total downloads12 ( #299,202 of 1,911,306 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #457,064 of 1,911,306 )
How can I increase my downloads?