Does Global Business Have a Responsibility to Promote Just Institutions?

Business Ethics Quarterly 19 (2):251-273 (2009)
Abstract
Drawing upon John Rawls’s framework in The Law of Peoples, this paper argues that MNEs have a responsibility to promote well-ordered social and political institutions in host countries that lack them. This responsibility is grounded in a negative duty not to cause harm. In addition to addressing the objection that promoting well-ordered institutions represents unjustified interference by MNEs, the paper provides guidance for managers of MNEs operating in host countries that lack just institutions. The paper argues for understanding corporate responsibility in relation to the specific institutional environment in which MNEs operate
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive
External links
  • Through your library Configure
    References found in this work BETA

    No references found.

    Citations of this work BETA

    View all 12 citations

    Similar books and articles
    Florian Wettstein (2010). For Better or For Worse. Business Ethics Quarterly 20 (2):275-283.
    Jennifer Oetzel, Kathleen A. Getz & Stephen Ladek (2007). Business and Violent Conflict. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 18:394-399.
    Analytics

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index

    2011-01-09

    Total downloads

    119 ( #6,343 of 1,088,905 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    17 ( #6,461 of 1,088,905 )

    How can I increase my downloads?

    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature


    Discussion
    Start a new thread
    Order:
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.