David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Contemporary Chinese Thought 10 (1):44-63 (1978)
In order to usurp the Party, seize power and restore capitalism, the Wang-Chang-Chiang-Yao anti-Party clique has turned out counterrevolutionary opinions in the ideological realm. They have tried in every way to distort and revise history and have fabricated the "struggle between the Confucianists and the Legalists" in history. They have confounded different social contradictions and have replaced the class struggle with the "struggle between the Confucianists and the Legalists" and the antagonism within the landlord class with the "line struggle." To them, Legalists were always "progressive" and "innovative" while Confucianists always "represented the forces of restoration." They have tried their best to glorify emperors, kings, generals and ministers in history, to praise Legalists as "saviors," to cover up the Legalists' nature as an exploiting class, to call for metaphysics and the idealist viewpoint of history, and to turn out revisionist fallacies. Because important changes took place in the Confucian and Legalist schools during the periods of the Western and Eastern Han dynasties, the "Gang of Four" and the writers in its service have showed a great interest in histories of the dynasties and have published a series of articles on the so-called "struggle between the Confucianists and the Legalists." In the current struggle against the "Gang of Four," it is of great practical significance to review the changes in the Confucian and Legalist schools and their roles and class nature during the Han dynasties, to criticize and expose the criminal clique's counterrevolutionary political intrigues and plots, and to clarify the historical facts confused by the "Gang of Four."
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Chin Sheng-Hsi (1976). The Debate Between the Confucianists and the Legalists Over the Question of Ancient History During the Spring and Autumn Period and the Warring States Period. Contemporary Chinese Thought 7 (3):57-77.
Shiling Xiang (2010). Inquiry Into the Transcendence of Tang Dynasty Confucians to Han Dynasty Confucians and the Transformation of Traditional Confucianism in Terms of Lunyu Bijie. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 5 (4):471-485.
Chang-Hee Son (2000). Haan (Han, Han) of Minjung Theology and Han (Han, Han) of Han Philosophy: In the Paradigm of Process Philisophy and Metaphysics of Relatedness. University Press of America.
Fan Pai-Ch'uan (1979). Was the Revolution of 1911 the Struggle Between Confucians and Legalists? Contemporary Chinese Thought 11 (2):40-54.
Alejandro Bárcenas (2012). Xunzi and Han Fei on Human Nature. International Philosophical Quarterly 52 (2):135-148.
Shih P'ing (1979). The "Doing Right Things on Behalf of Heaven" Promoted in the Book Shui Hu and Neo-Confucianism in the Sung and Ming Dynasties. Contemporary Chinese Thought 11 (2):19-26.
Chunfeng Jin (2010). A Reconsideration of the Characteristics of Song-Ming Li Xue. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 5 (3):352-376.
Shu-hsien Liu (1969). Hsiung Shih-Li's Theory of Causation. Philosophy East and West 19 (4):399-407.
Genyou Wu (2006). On the Idea of Freedom and its Rejection in Chinese Thought and Institutions. Asian Philosophy 16 (3):219 – 235.
Shuduo Gong (2007). Characteristics of Lixue in Qing Dynasty. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 2 (1):1-24.
Ji Yeon Han, Hyun Soon Park & Hyeonju Jeong (2013). Individual and Organizational Antecedents of Professional Ethics of Public Relations Practitioners in Korea. Journal of Business Ethics 116 (3):553-566.
Jig-Chuen Lee (1991). How Tai Chen Differs From the Neo-Confucianists on Li. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 18 (4):395-409.
Eirik Lang Harris (2013). Han Fei on the Problem of Morality. In Paul R. Goldin (ed.), Dao Companion to the Philosophy of Han Fei. Springer
Chung-Ying Cheng (1983). Metaphysics of Tao and Dialectics of Fa: An Evaluation of HTSC in Relations to Lao Tzu and Han Fei and an Analytical Study of Interrelationships of Tao, Fa, Hsing, Ming and Li. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 10 (3):251-284.
Added to index2010-12-11
Total downloads9 ( #391,263 of 1,938,452 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #214,500 of 1,938,452 )
How can I increase my downloads?