Foundation of Religious Beliefs after Foundationalism: Wittgenstein between Nielsen and Phillips
Religious Studies 31 (2):251 - 267 (1995)
| Abstract | Religious beliefs have often been taken either as absolutely foundational to all others or as ultimately founded on something else. This essay starts with an endorsement of the contemporary critique of foundationalism but sets its task as to search for the foundation(s) of religious belief after foundationalism. In its third and main part, it argues for a Wittgensteinian reflective equilibrium (within a belief system, between believing and acting and among people with different ways of believing and acting) as such a foundation. In this reflective equilibrium, religious beliefs are no more and no less foundational to, or founded by, other beliefs and practices. To appreciate this perspective better, I argue, in the first part, that Kai Neilsen's charge of Wittgenstein as a fideist is not accurate, and, in the second part, that D. Z. Phillips's fideistic contentions are unWittgensteinian. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,709 |
| External links |
|
| Through your library | Configure |
Jordan Curnutt (1998). Huang on Wittgenstein on Religious Epistemology. Religious Studies 34 (1):81-89.
Gemma Cornelissen (2012). Belief-Based Exemptions: Are Religious Beliefs Special? Ratio Juris 25 (1):85-109.
Jonathan L. Kvanvig (1984). What is Wrong with Minimal Foundationalism? Erkenntnis 21 (2):175-184.
Michael Huemer (1997). Probability and Coherence Justification. Southern Journal of Philosophy 35 (4):463-472.
Daniel Howard-Snyder (2012). Foundationalism. In Andrew Cullison (ed.), The Continuum Companion to Epistemology. Continuum.
D. Z. Phillips (1988/1995). Faith After Foundationalism: Plantinga-Rorty-Lindbeck-Berger: Critiques and Alternatives. Westview Press.
Renata Ziemińska (1997). Internalizm i fundamentalizm w epistemologii. Filozofia Nauki 3.
N. K. Verbin (2000). Religious Beliefs and Aspect Seeing. Religious Studies 36 (1):1-23.
Mikel Burley (2008). Phillips and Realists on Religious Beliefs and the Fruits Thereof. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 64 (3):141 - 153.
Daniel Howard-Snyder & Christian Lee (2005). On a “Fatal Dilemma” for Moderate Foundationalism. Journal of Philosophical Research 30:251-259.
John H. Whittaker (2008). D. Z. Phillips and Reasonable Belief. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 63 (1/3):103 - 129.
Daniel D. Hutto (2004). Two Wittgensteins Too Many: Wittgenstein's Foundationalism. In D. Moyal-Sharrock (ed.), The Third Wittgenstein. Ashgate.
Dirk-Martin Grube (1995). Religious Experience After the Demise of Foundationalism. Religious Studies 31 (1):37 - 52.
Duncan Richter (2001). Wittgensteinian Foundationalism. Erkenntnis 55 (3):349–358.
David Shatz (1983). Foundationalism, Coherentism, and the Levels Gambit. Synthese 55 (1):97 - 118.
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2011-05-29Total downloads4 ( #178,800 of 549,600 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,397 of 549,600 )How can I increase my downloads? |

