The Overlap Feature of the Genetic Equidistance Result—A Fundamental Biological Phenomenon Overlooked for Nearly Half of a Century
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Biological Theory 5 (1):40-52 (2010)
The genetic equidistance result shows that different species are approximately equidistant to a simpler outgroup in protein sequence similarity, as first reported by Margoliash in 1963. This result, together with those of Zuckerkandl and Pauling in 1962 inspired the molecular clock and in turn the neutral theory of evolution. Here it is shown that the clock/neutral theory had from the beginning overlooked another characteristic of the equidistance result, the overlap feature, which shows a large number of overlapped mutant amino acid positions where any pair of any three species is different provided that the species concerned differ from one another in complexity as a result of macroevolution. In contrast, when simple organisms of similar complexity and short evolutionary divergence are compared, there are only a small number of overlaps largely consistent with chance or the neutral theory. The full reality of the equidistance result strongly supports the Maximum Genetic Diversity hypothesis, a more complete account of hereditary changes
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Francisco J. Ayala (1999). Molecular Clock Mirages. Bioessays 21 (1):71-75.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Hendrik Gommer (2012). The Biological Essence of Law. Ratio Juris 25 (1):59-84.
Russell Powell (2010). The Evolutionary Biological Implications of Human Genetic Engineering. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 37 (1):22.
Kevin J. Corcoran (2001). The Trouble with Searle's Biological Naturalism. Erkenntnis 55 (3):307-324.
Henry Howe & John Lyne (1992). Gene Talk in Sociobiology. Social Epistemology 6 (2):109 – 163.
Joseph Agassi (1980). Between Science and Technology. Philosophy of Science 47 (1):82-99.
Derek Ettinger (2012). Genes, Gestation, and Social Norms. Law and Philosophy 31 (3):243-268.
Peter J. Riggs (1996). Spacetime or Quantum Particles: The Ontology of Quantum Gravity? In P. Riggs (ed.), Natural Kinds, Laws of Nature and Scientific Methodology. Kluwer Academic Publishers 211--226.
Lenny Moss (1992). A Kernel of Truth? On the Reality of the Genetic Program. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992:335 - 348.
Koffi N. Maglo (2011). The Case Against Biological Realism About Race: From Darwin to the Post-Genomic Era. Perspectives on Science 19 (4):361-390.
Johannes Roessler (2011). Perceptual Attention and the Space of Reasons. In Christopher Mole, Declan Smithies & Wayne Wu (eds.), Attention: Philosophical and Psychological Essays. Oxford University Press 274.
Maureen O'Malley, Alexander Powell, Jonathan Davies & Jane Calvert (2008). Knowledge-Making Distinctions in Synthetic Biology. Bioessays 30 (1):57-65.
Fritz Allhoff (2004). Telomeres and the Ethics of Human Cloning. American Journal of Bioethics 4 (2):29 – 31.
Christopher Mole, Declan Smithies & Wayne Wu (eds.) (2011). Attention: Philosophical and Psychological Essays. Oxford University Press.
Baris Parkan (2004). A Process-Ontological Account of Work. Axiomathes 14 (1-3):219-235.
Added to index2010-09-14
Total downloads41 ( #65,667 of 1,700,257 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #206,271 of 1,700,257 )
How can I increase my downloads?