David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 16 (2):219-226 (2007)
The Nobel Laureate Illya Prigogine compares the recent breakthroughs in human biology to the major changes that occurred when the Neolithic period succeeded the Paleolithic, 12,000 years ago. Although there is disagreement about the meaning of these changes, most opposing views recognize that a “major transformation” took place. Some interpret the recent breakthroughs in neuroscience as the first step toward “our posthuman future” whereas others see the consequences of these achievements as the end of humankind. Genomics and neuroscience are the main fields that, at this point, give rise to such a debate, some authors stating that neuroscience raises even greater anthropological and ethical challenges than does genomics. This article focuses on neuroscience. Its main object is to critically assess these diverging opinions on the impact of neuroscience and to determine whether both sides are not telling us something important about ourselves and how neuroscience could enlighten healthcare ethics
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Bruce Maxwell & Eric Racine (2012). Does the Neuroscience Research on Early Stress Justify Responsive Childcare? Examining Interwoven Epistemological and Ethical Challenges. Neuroethics 5 (2):159-172.
May Østby & Stål Bjørkly (2011). Vignette Selection for Ethical Reflections: A Selection Procedure for Vignettes to Investigate Staff Reflections on the Ethical Challenges in Interaction with People with Intellectual Disabilities. Ethics and Social Welfare 5 (3):277-295.
Bryn Williams-Jones & Vural Ozdemir (2008). Challenges for Corporate Ethics in Marketing Genetic Tests. Journal of Business Ethics 77 (1):33 - 44.
John Bickle (2005). Replies. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 4 (3):285-296.
David A. Krueger (2009). Ethical Reflections on the Opportunities and Challenges for International Business in China. Journal of Business Ethics 89 (2):145 - 156.
James Beebe (2010). Constraints on Sceptical Hypotheses. Philosophical Quarterly 60 (240):449-470.
Debashis Guha (2008). Facing the Challenges of Environmental Ethical Scepticism. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 23:29-35.
M.-L. Lamau, B. Cadore & P. Boitte (1997). From “the Ethical Treatment of Patients in a Persistent Vegetative State” to a Philosophical Reflection on Contemporary Medicine. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 18 (3).
Carrie Figdor (2013). What is the “Cognitive” in Cognitive Neuroscience? Neuroethics 6 (1):105-114.
Ian G. Barbour (1999). Neuroscience, Artificial Intelligence, and Human Nature: Theological and Philosophical Reflections. In Zygon. Notre Dame: University Notre Dame Press 361-398.
Ken McPhail (2001). The Ethical Challenges of Globalisation: Critical Reflections on the ISBEE 2nd World Congress in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Business Ethics 10 (1):78–82.
Judy Illes & Eric Racine (2005). Imaging or Imagining? A Neuroethics Challenge Informed by Genetics. American Journal of Bioethics 5 (2):5 – 18.
Michael S. Moore (2012). Responsible Choices, Desert-Based Legal Institutions, and the Challenges of Contemporary Neuroscience. Social Philosophy and Policy 29 (1):233-279.
Henk Ten Have (1995). The Anthropological Tradition in the Philosophy of Medicine. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 16 (1).
Added to index2010-08-24
Total downloads14 ( #252,512 of 1,902,070 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #167,852 of 1,902,070 )
How can I increase my downloads?