Poiesis and Praxis 6 (3-4):203-217 (2009)
|Abstract||Traditionally, discussion about neuroimaging focuses on methodological improvement and neurobiological findings. In current psychiatric neuroimaging, the research focus broadens and includes concepts such as the self, personality, well-being, and psychiatric disease. This calls for the inclusion of disciplines like psychology and philosophy in a dialogue with neuroscience. Furthermore, it raises the question of how theories from these areas relate to neuroimaging findings: are results generated by objective data independent of theories? Is there an epistemological priority for the theories used for generating hypotheses and for interpreting the results? Or do theoretical concepts and neuroimaging data influence each other? In this paper, we will discuss these positions concerning the priority of concepts and data in neuroimaging and provide arguments for an interdependence of concepts and data. An awareness of these considerations may help professionals from the life sciences and humanities as well as laypersons to avoid misunderstandings and oversimplifications.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Christian G. Huber & Johannes Huber (2009). Epistemological Considerations on Neuroimaging – a Crucial Prerequisite for Neuroethics. Bioethics 23 (6):340-348.
Sergi G. Costafreda (2012). Meta-Analysis, Mega-Analysis, and Task Analysis in fMRI Research. Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 18 (4).
Judy Illes & Eric Racine (2005). Imaging or Imagining? A Neuroethics Challenge Informed by Genetics. American Journal of Bioethics 5 (2):5 – 18.
Kerry Lee & Swee Fong Ng (2011). Neuroscience and the Teaching of Mathematics. Educational Philosophy and Theory 43 (1):81-86.
Jan-Hendrik Heinrichs (2012). The Sensitivity of Neuroimaging Data. Neuroethics 5 (2):185-195.
Jonathan K. Foster (1999). Hippocampus, Recognition, and Recall: A New Twist on Some Old Data? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (3):449-450.
A. Kehagia, K. Tairyan, C. Federico, G. Glover & J. Illes (2012). More Education, Less Administration: Reflections of Neuroimagers' Attitudes to Ethics Through the Qualitative Looking Glass. Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (4):775-788.
Lisa J. Burklund & Matthew D. Lieberman (2012). Advances in Functional Neuroimaging of Psychopathology. Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 18 (4).
Adina L. Roskies (2008). Neuroimaging and Inferential Distance. Neuroethics 1 (1).
Orsolya Friedrich (2013). Knowledge of Partial Awareness in Disorders of Consciousness: Implications for Ethical Evaluations? Neuroethics 6 (1):13-23.
Geraint Rees (2001). Neuroimaging of Visual Awareness in Patients and Normal Subjects. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 11 (2):150-156.
Nicole A. Vincent (2009). Neuroimaging and Responsibility Assessments. Neuroethics 4 (1):35-49.
Leo A. Goodman, Statistical Magic and/or Statistical Serendipity: An Age of Progress in the Analysis of Categorical Data.
Alison C. Boyce (2009). Neuroimaging in Psychiatry: Evaluating the Ethical Consequences for Patient Care. Bioethics 23 (6):349-359.
Daniel A. Weiskopf (2009). The Plurality of Concepts. Synthese 169 (1):145 - 173.
Added to index2010-09-14
Total downloads12 ( #93,408 of 549,122 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,361 of 549,122 )
How can I increase my downloads?