David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Dialogue 27 (03):489- (1988)
Gauthier's version of the Lockean proviso (in Morals by Agreement) is inappropriate as the foundation for moral rights he takes it to be. This is so for a number of reasons. It lacks any proportionality test thus allowing arbitrarily severe harms to others to prevent trivial harms to oneself. It allows one to inflict any harm on another provided that if one did not do so, someone else would. And, by interpreting the notion of bettering or worsening one's position in terms of subjective expected utility, it allows immoral manipulation of others and imposes unwarranted restrictions based on preferences that should carry no moral weight.
|Keywords||Gauthier Lockean Proviso self-ownership|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Robert Nozick (1974). Anarchy, State and Utopia. Basic Books.
David P. Gauthier (1986). Morals by Agreement. Oxford University Press.
John Locke (1988). Two Treatises of Government. Cambridge University Press.
John Locke (1966). Two Treatises of Government. Philosophical Quarterly 16 (65):365.
Citations of this work BETA
Adam D. Moore (2010). Privacy, Public Health, and Controlling Medical Information. HEC Forum 22 (3):225-240.
Similar books and articles
Tibor R. Machan (2009). Self-Ownership and the Lockean Proviso. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 39 (1):93-98.
Peter Vallentyne (2007). On Original Appropriation. In Malcolm Murray (ed.), Liberty, Games, and Contracts: Jan Narveson and the Defence of Libertarianism. Aldershot: Ashgate Press
Helga Varden (2012). The Lockean Enough-and-as-Good Proviso: An Internal Critique. Journal of Moral Philosophy 9 (3):410-442.
Gordon Hull (2009). Clearing the Rubbish: Locke, the Waste Proviso, and the Moral Justification of Intellectual Property. Public Affairs Quarterly 23 (1):67-93.
John Hadley (2005). Excluding Destruction. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 12 (2):22-29.
Cara Nine (2010). Ecological Refugees, States Borders, and the Lockean Proviso. Journal of Applied Philosophy 27 (4):359-375.
Daniel Moseley (2011). A Lockean Argument for Basic Income. Basic Income Studies 6 (2):11.
Eric Mack (2002). Self-Ownership, Marxism, and Egalitarianism: Part II: Challenges to the Self-Ownership Thesis. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 1 (2):237-276.
Murray Hofmans-Sheard (2005). Preserving Common Rights Within Private Property. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 12 (2):3-9.
Murray Sheard (2007). Sustainability and Property Rights in Environmental Resources. Environmental Ethics 29 (4):389-401.
David R. Lea (1994). Lockean Property Rights, Tully's Community Ownership, and Melanesian Customary Communal Ownership. Journal of Social Philosophy 25 (1):117-132.
Evan Fox-Decent (1998). Why Self-Ownership is Prescriptively Impotent. Journal of Value Inquiry 32 (4):489-506.
Helga Varden (2010). Lockean Freedom and the Proviso's Appeal to Scientific Knowledge. Social Theory and Practice 36 (1):1-20.
Michael Zuckert (2005). Natural Rights and Imperial Constitutionalism: The American Revolution and the Development of the American Amalgam. Social Philosophy and Policy 22 (1):27-55.
Husain Sarkar (1982). The Lockean Proviso. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 12 (1):47 - 59.
Added to index2010-09-25
Total downloads49 ( #85,621 of 1,902,195 )
Recent downloads (6 months)11 ( #66,243 of 1,902,195 )
How can I increase my downloads?