Graduate studies at Western
Estetika 47 (2) (2010)
|Abstract||Perspective, Symbol, and Symbolic Form: Concerning the Relationship between Cassirer and Panofsky During the last two decades of the twentieth century, there was a sudden surge of interest in Ernst Cassirer’s major work, The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms (1923–29), and Erwin Panofsky’s essay, ‘Perspective as Symbolic Form’ (1927), an interest that has continued uninterrupted to the present day. Particularly amongst art historians, however, a serious misunderstanding remains evident here – the confusing of ‘symbolic form’ with ‘symbol’. Cultural and perceptual mediations, in which objects (and subjects) are only just in the process of forming, are carelessly turned into arbitrary, isolated objects of art history or pictorial history. Every work, in this view, is regarded as a ‘symbolic form’ to the extent that a representation of the world is ‘expressed’ in it. This article initially reviews Panofsky’s essay in order to establish the context in which the art historian uses the term ‘symbolic form’. His use of it is then compared with Cassirer’s original understanding of the term. A careful distinction is made between ‘symbol’, ‘symbolic pregnance’, and ‘symbolic form’, and this is followed by an analysis of scattered remarks in Cassirer’s writings, and particularly in his posthumous manuscripts and notes, on ‘art’ as symbolic form and on the spatial form that is prior to all perception and art production, as well as his call for a kind of art history that conceives of itself as a scholarly discipline. The article concludes with the recognition that Panofsky not only deliberately, but justifiably – that is, in the spirit of Cassirer, at least – transferred the expression ‘symbolic form’ to ‘perspective’|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Thora Ilin Bayer (2004). History As Symbolic Form. Idealistic Studies 34 (1):49-65.
Peer F. Bundgaard (2011). The Grammar of Aesthetic Intuition: On Ernst Cassirer's Concept of Symbolic Form in the Visual Arts. Synthese 179 (1):43 - 57.
Eirik J. Irgens (2011). Pluralism in Management: Organizational Theory, Management Education, and Ernst Cassirer. Routledge.
Ursula Renz (2011). From Philosophy to Criticism of Myth: Cassirer's Concept of Myth. Synthese 179 (1):135 - 152.
Thora Ilin Bayer (2001). Cassirer's Metaphysics of Symbolic Forms: A Philosophical Commentary. Yale University Press.
John Michael Krois (2011). The Priority of "Symbolism" Over Language in Cassirer's Philosophy. Synthese 179 (1):9 - 20.
Thora Ilin Bayer (2006). Art as Symbolic Form: Cassirer on the Educational Value of Art. Journal of Aesthetic Education 40 (4):51-64.
Christiane Schmitz-Rigal (2011). Science and Art: Physics as a Symbolic Formation. Synthese 179 (1):21 - 41.
Sebastian Luft (2004). Cassirer's Philosophy of Symbolic Forms. Idealistic Studies 34 (1):25-47.
Donald Phillip Verene (2011). The Origins of the Philosophy of Symbolic Forms: Kant, Hegel, and Cassirer. Northwestern University Press.
Sirkku Ikonen (2011). Cassirer's Critique of Culture. Synthese 179 (1):187-202.
Paul Bishop (2006). Eine Geistige Urform der Geschichtlichen Erkenntnis'? Cassirer and Bachofen on the Symbol. In Paul Bishop & R. H. Stephenson (eds.), The Paths of Symbolic Knowledge: Occasional Papers in Cassirer and Cultural-Theory Studies, Presented at the University of Glasgow's Centre for Intercultural Studies. Maney.
D. P. Verene (1978). Cassirer's Concept of Symbolic Form and Human Creativity. Idealistic Studies 8 (1):14-32.
Ernst Wolfgang Orth (2011). Ernst Cassirer as Cultural Scientist. Synthese 179 (1):115 - 134.
Added to index2011-02-18
Total downloads12 ( #101,187 of 739,318 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,243 of 739,318 )
How can I increase my downloads?