Perspektive, Symbol und symbolische Form. Zum Verhältnis Cassirer – Panofsky
Estetika 47 (2) (2010)
| Abstract | Perspective, Symbol, and Symbolic Form: Concerning the Relationship between Cassirer and Panofsky During the last two decades of the twentieth century, there was a sudden surge of interest in Ernst Cassirer’s major work, The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms (1923–29), and Erwin Panofsky’s essay, ‘Perspective as Symbolic Form’ (1927), an interest that has continued uninterrupted to the present day. Particularly amongst art historians, however, a serious misunderstanding remains evident here – the confusing of ‘symbolic form’ with ‘symbol’. Cultural and perceptual mediations, in which objects (and subjects) are only just in the process of forming, are carelessly turned into arbitrary, isolated objects of art history or pictorial history. Every work, in this view, is regarded as a ‘symbolic form’ to the extent that a representation of the world is ‘expressed’ in it. This article initially reviews Panofsky’s essay in order to establish the context in which the art historian uses the term ‘symbolic form’. His use of it is then compared with Cassirer’s original understanding of the term. A careful distinction is made between ‘symbol’, ‘symbolic pregnance’, and ‘symbolic form’, and this is followed by an analysis of scattered remarks in Cassirer’s writings, and particularly in his posthumous manuscripts and notes, on ‘art’ as symbolic form and on the spatial form that is prior to all perception and art production, as well as his call for a kind of art history that conceives of itself as a scholarly discipline. The article concludes with the recognition that Panofsky not only deliberately, but justifiably – that is, in the spirit of Cassirer, at least – transferred the expression ‘symbolic form’ to ‘perspective’ | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,705 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesThora Ilin Bayer (2004). History As Symbolic Form. Idealistic Studies 34 (1):49-65.
Ursula Renz (forthcoming). From Philosophy to Criticism of Myth: Cassirer's Concept of Myth. Synthese.
Thora Ilin Bayer (2001). Cassirer's Metaphysics of Symbolic Forms: A Philosophical Commentary. Yale University Press.
Thora Ilin Bayer (2006). Art as Symbolic Form: Cassirer on the Educational Value of Art. Journal of Aesthetic Education 40 (4).
Sebastian Luft (2004). Cassirer's Philosophy of Symbolic Forms. Idealistic Studies 34 (1):25-47.
Donald Phillip Verene (2011). The Origins of the Philosophy of Symbolic Forms: Kant, Hegel, and Cassirer. Northwestern University Press.
Paul Bishop (2006). Eine Geistige Urform der Geschichtlichen Erkenntnis'? Cassirer and Bachofen on the Symbol. In Paul Bishop & R. H. Stephenson (eds.), The Paths of Symbolic Knowledge: Occasional Papers in Cassirer and Cultural-Theory Studies, Presented at the University of Glasgow's Centre for Intercultural Studies. Maney.
D. P. Verene (1978). Cassirer's Concept of Symbolic Form and Human Creativity. Idealistic Studies 8 (1):14-32.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2011-02-18Total downloads12 ( #93,438 of 549,198 )Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,418 of 549,198 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
