The Conversation Argument for Actual Intentionalism
British Journal of Aesthetics 52 (3):241-256 (2012)
| Abstract | Proponents of actual intentionalism hold that an author’s actual intentions should constrain the proper interpretation of his or her works. If, for example, we have good reason to think Proust intends his character Marcel to set out to write a different novel from In Search of Lost Time itself, then that is how we should interpret the text. After decades of being denigrated as the ‘intentional fallacy’, actual intentionalism has enjoyed a renaissance in philosophical aesthetics in recent years, thanks in large part to the image of the conversation that has been enlisted in its favour: when we neglect the author’s intended construal of the text and opt instead for some clever alternative interpretation of our own, we are depriving ourselves of the chance to engage in a conversation (in some metaphorical sense) with this author—and thus are losing the chance (again, in some metaphorical sense) to commune with another human being. In this paper I will raise doubts about whether this appeal to conversation actually helps the actual intentionalist’s case. When we reflect on the essentially interactive nature of any conversation worthy of that name, we see that this conversation metaphor will not deliver the restrictive lesson of actual intentionalism. In fact, it militates against it | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,709 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesJukka Mikkonen (2009). Intentions and Interpretations: Philosophical Fiction as Conversation. Contemporary Aesthetics 7.
Sheila Lintott (2002). When Artists Fail: A Reply to Trivedi. British Journal of Aesthetics 42 (1):64-72.
Stephen Davies (2006). Authors' Intentions, Literary Interpretation, and Literary Value. British Journal of Aesthetics 46 (3):223-247.
Peter Kreeft (2009). If Einstein Had Been a Surfer: A Surfer, a Scientist, and a Philosopher Discuss a "Universal Wave Theory" or "Theory of Everything". St. Augustine's Press.
Gary Iseminger (1996). Actual Intentionalism Vs. Hypothetical Intentionalism. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 54 (4):319-326.
Lou Marinoff (2012). The Inner Philosopher: Conversations on Philosophy's Transformative Power. Dialogue Path Press.
Robert A. Stecker (2006). Moderate Actual Intentionalism Defended. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 64 (4):429-438.
Sherri Irvin (2009). Teaching and Learning Guide For: Authors, Intentions and Literary Meaning. Philosophy Compass 4 (1):287-291.
Vivienne Brown (2007). Historical Interpretation, Intentionalism and Philosophy of Mind. Journal of the Philosophy of History 1 (1):25-62.
Hans Maes (2010). Intention, Interpretation and Contemporary Visual Art. British Journal of Aesthetics 50 (2):121-138.
No��L. Carroll (2000). Interpretation and Intention: The Debate Between Hypothetical and Actual Intentionalism. Metaphilosophy 31 (1-2):75-95.
Nel Noddings (1994). Conversation as Moral Education. Journal of Moral Education 23 (2):107-118.
Shaun Gallagher (2002). Conversations in Postmodern Hermeneutics. In H. Silverman (ed.), Lyotard: Philosophy, Politics, and the Sublime. Routledge.
Jukka Mikkonen (2009). Truth-Claiming in Fiction: Towards a Poetics of Literary Assertion. Nordic Journal of Aesthetics 38 (18):34.
Saam Trivedi (2001). An Epistemic Dilemma for Actual Intentionalism. British Journal of Aesthetics 41 (2):192-206.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2012-07-10Total downloads9 ( #114,230 of 549,699 )Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #25,807 of 549,699 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
