David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 4 (1):43-49 (2007)
Whakapapa is the foundation of traditional Māori social structure and it perpetuates a value base that locates people through their relationships to the physical and spiritual worlds. As part of a new envirogenomics research programme, researchers at the Institute of Environmental Science and Research (ESR) are developing a study with an iwi (tribe) to identify combinations of genetic and environmental factors that may contribute to current health status. A major objective of this study is to utilise whakapapa (genealogical information) to explore patterns of genetic variation unique to the iwi and to correlate these with potential disease or ill health. Genetic testing and screening raises numerous ethical issues, particularly when indigenous peoples are the subjects. This paper will outline ESR’s strategy for addressing indigenous concerns about genetic testing and how whakapapa forms an integral part of the envirogenomics research programme.
|Keywords||Genomics Oceanic ancestry group Genetic screening Ethics Culture|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Fiona Cram, Hazel Phillips, Bevan Tipene-Matua, Murray Parsons & Katrina Taupo (2004). A 'Parallel Process'? Beginning a Constructive Conversation About a Mäori Methodology. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 1 (1):14-19.
Citations of this work BETA
Emma Kowal, Glenn Pearson, Chris S. Peacock, Sarra E. Jamieson & Jenefer M. Blackwell (2012). Genetic Research and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 9 (4):419-432.
Maui L. Hudson & Khyla Russell (2009). The Treaty of Waitangi and Research Ethics in Aotearoa. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 6 (1):61-68.
Similar books and articles
Lee Black & Kelly A. McClellan (2011). Familial Communication of Research Results: A Need to Know? Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 39 (4):605-613.
Robert H. Blank (1982). Public Policy Implications of Human Genetic Technology: Genetic Screening. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 7 (4):355-374.
M. Richards (2001). How Distinctive is Genetic Information? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 32 (4):663-687.
E. Dye Danielle, Beverley McNamara Leanne Youngs & Peter O’Leary Jack Goldblatt (2010). The Disclosure of Genetic Information: A Human Research Ethics Perspective. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 7 (1).
Asya Al-Riyami, Deepali Jaju, Sanjay Jaju & Henry J. Silverman (2011). The Adequacy of Informed Consent Forms in Genetic Research in Oman: A Pilot Study. Developing World Bioethics 11 (2):57-62.
V. Launis (2000). The Use of Genetic Test Information in Insurance: The Argument From Indistinguishability Reconsidered. Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (3):299-310.
M. O. (2001). Genetic Prediction: What Are the Limits? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 32 (4):619-633.
Karen J. Maschke (2010). Wanted: Human Biospecimens. Hastings Center Report 40 (5):21-23.
Ainsley Newson (2004). The Nature and Significance of Behavioural Genetic Information. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 25 (2):89-111.
Donald Evans (2012). Whakapapa, Genealogy and Genetics. Bioethics 26 (4):182-190.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads9 ( #338,004 of 1,789,721 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #313,929 of 1,789,721 )
How can I increase my downloads?