David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Educational Philosophy and Theory 43 (10):1065-1087 (2011)
On the point that, in practices of critical thinking, we respond spontaneously in concrete situations, this paper presents an account on behalf of Wittgenstein. I argue that the ‘seeing-things-aright’ model of Luntley's Wittgenstein is not adequate, since it pays insufficient attention to radically new circumstances, in which the content of norms is updated. While endorsing Bailin's emphasis on criteria of critical thinking, Wittgenstein would agree with Papastephanou and Angeli's demand to look behind criteriology. He maintains the primacy of the practical, and yet contends that a reasonable person lets rules of rationality compel her. These rules are not mere heuristics. I further examine Burbules' conception of communicative reason, and, among others, his interpretation of Wittgenstein's sign-post example
|Keywords||reasonableness Wittgenstein criteriology critical thinking Luntley Burbules Bailin spontaneous decision‐making Papastephanou and Angeli|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Michael Baur (2002). Reversing Rawls Criteriology, Contractualism and the Primacy of the Practical. Philosophy and Social Criticism 28 (3):251-296.
Nicole Baur (2002). Reversing Rawls: Criteriology, Contractualism and the Primacy of the Practical. Philosophy and Social Criticism 28 (3):251-296.
Nicholas C. Burbules (2000). Lyotard on Wittgenstein: The Differend, Language Games, and Education. In Pradeep Ajit Dhillon & Paul Standish (eds.), Lyotard: Just Education. Routledge. 36--53.
Richard Thomas Eldridge (1997). Leading a Human Life: Wittgenstein, Intentionality, and Romanticism. University of Chicago Press.
David H. Finkelstein (2000). Wittgenstein on Rules and Platonism. In Alice Crary & Rupert Read (eds.), The New Wittgenstein. Routledge. 83-100.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Carlos Saiz & Ana M. Nieto (2010). Critical Thinking: A Question of Aptitude and Attitude? Inquiry 25 (2):19-26.
Barbara Thayer-Bacon (1998). Transforming and Redescribing Critical Thinking: Constructive Thinking. [REVIEW] Studies in Philosophy and Education 17 (2/3):123-148.
Hye-Kyung Kim (2006). Learning, Critical Thinking, and Confucius. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 4:79-84.
Steve Cady (2004). Integrating Critical Thinking Into Daily Life. Inquiry 23 (3):33-36.
M. Neil Browne & Michelle Crosby (2004). Nurturing the Relational Promise of Critical Thinking. Inquiry 23 (3):23-26.
Jennifer Wilson Mulnix (2010). Thinking Critically About Critical Thinking. Educational Philosophy and Theory 44 (5):464-479.
James D. Marshall (2001). A Critical Theory of the Self: Wittgenstein, Nietzsche, Foucault. Studies in Philosophy and Education 20 (1):75-91.
Peter Boghossian (2011). Critical Thinking and Constructivism: Mambo Dog Fish to the Banana Patch. Journal of Philosophy of Education 46 (1):73-84.
Kal Alston (2001). Re/Thinking Critical Thinking: The Seductions of Everyday Life. Studies in Philosophy and Education 20 (1):27-40.
Harvey Siegel (2008). Autonomy, Critical Thinking and the Wittgensteinian Legacy: Reflections on Christopher Winch, Education, Autonomy and Critical Thinking. Journal of Philosophy of Education 42 (1):165-184.
Added to index2010-02-11
Total downloads22 ( #83,083 of 1,102,037 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #68,255 of 1,102,037 )
How can I increase my downloads?