Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (1):33-33 (2003)
|Abstract||B&H understate the difficulties facing their version of color realism. We doubt that they can fix reflectance types and magnitudes in a way that does not invoke relations to perceivers. B&HÂ’s account therefore resembles the dispositional or ecological accounts that they dismiss. This is a good thing, for a dispositional account is promising if understood in an ecological framework|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Dejan Todorovic (2003). Color Realism and Color Illusions. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (1):49-50.
Ian Gold (2001). The Evolution of Color Vision. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (4):671-671.
Evan Thompson (1995). Colour Vision: A Study in Cognitive Science and the Philosophy of Perception. New York: Routledge.
Kathrin Glüer (2007). Colors Without Circles? Erkenntnis 66 (1-2):107--131.
Erik Myin (2003). An Account of Color Without a Subject? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (1):42-43.
Alex Byrne & David Hilbert (eds.) (1997). Readings on Color I: The Philosophy of Color. The Mit Press.
Peter W. Ross (2012). Perceived Colors and Perceived Locations: A Problem for Color Subjectivism. American Philosophical Quarterly 49 (2):125-138.
Murata Junichi (2005). Space and Color: Toward an Ecological Phenomenology. Continental Philosophy Review 38 (1-2):1-17.
James J. Clark (2003). Ecological Considerations Support Color Physicalism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (1):24-25.
Virgil Whitmyer (1999). Ecological Color. Philosophical Psychology 12 (2):197-214.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads6 ( #145,615 of 549,088 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,317 of 549,088 )
How can I increase my downloads?