|Abstract||The problem I am concerned with is very general: Why do we need a coercive institution in our society to control our behavior? This question is a little different from "Why do we need a government?" in two ways: First, because "coercive institution" is a broader term than "government"; probably not every coercive institution that controlled people's behavior would be called a government, though every government is a coercive institution (that is, an institution exercising coercion as one of its main functions). Second, controlling the behavior of the members of the society in which it exists is perhaps not the only important function of government (it may be, for example, that we need a government to fight people from other societies); I will not consider other possible things we might need a coercive institution to do. I will only consider whether we as a society need such an institution to control our own behavior.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Răzvan Diaconescu (2004). An Institution-Independent Proof of Craig Interpolation Theorem. Studia Logica 77 (1):59 - 79.
Maurice Merleau-Ponty (2010). Institution and Passivity: Course Notes From the Collège de France (1954-1955). Northwestern University Press.
Russell Hardin (1990). Rationally Justifying Political Coercion. Journal of Philosophical Research 15:79-91.
Joan McGregor (1988). Bargaining Advantages and Coercion in the Market. Philosophy Research Archives 14:23-50.
Warren J. Samuels (1995). Society is a Process of Mutual Coercion and Governance, Selectively Perceived: Rejoinder to Higgs. Critical Review 9 (3):437-443.
Richard Foley (1982). Illegal Behavior. Law and Philosophy 1 (1):131 - 158.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads45 ( #24,531 of 549,087 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #15,152 of 549,087 )
How can I increase my downloads?