David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Southern Journal of Philosophy 44 (2):237-251 (2006)
Recent philosophical arguments in favor of legal markets in human organs such as kidneys claim that respect for autonomy justifies such markets. I argue that these arguments fail to establish the moral permissibility of commercialized organ sales because they do not show that those most likely to serve as vendors would choose to sell autonomously. Pro-market views utilize hierarchical theories of autonomy to demonstrate that potential organ vendors may autonomously consent to selling their organs even in the absence of any practical alternative to doing so. But central to hierarchical accounts of autonomy is the idea that persons my experience volitional ambivalence, a condition in which the will is irreconcilably conflicted. Because commercialized organ sales would create volitional ambivalence in many of those who opt to sell an organ, the choice to sell an organ would not be an autonomous one
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Paul M. Hughes (2009). Presumed Consent: State Organ Confiscation or Mandated Charity? [REVIEW] HEC Forum 21 (1):1-26.
P. M. Hughes (2009). Constraint, Consent, and Well-Being in Human Kidney Sales. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 34 (6):606-631.
Similar books and articles
Rob Lawlor (2011). Organ Sales Needn't Be Exploitative (but It Matters If They Are). Bioethics 25 (5):250-259.
Paul M. Hughes (1998). Exploitation, Autonomy, and the Case for Organ Sales. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 12 (1):89-95.
Paul M. Hughes (1998). Exploitation, Autonomy, and the Case for Organ Sales. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 12 (1):89--95.
Robert S. Taylor (2007). Self-Ownership and Transplantable Human Organs. Public Affairs Quarterly 21 (1):89-107.
James J. Delaney, Dunleavy Hall, David B. Hershenov & Park Hall (2010). The Metaphysical Basis of a Liberal Organ Procurement Policy. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 31 (4):303-315.
James Stacey Taylor (2006). Why the 'Black Market' Arguments Against Legalizing Organ Sales Fail. Res Publica 12 (2):163-178.
Rob Lawlor (2014). Organ Sales: Exploitative at Any Price? Bioethics 28 (4):194-202.
Simon Rippon (2014). Imposing Options on People in Poverty: The Harm of a Live Donor Organ Market. Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (3):145-150.
Lawrence Torcello & Stephen Wear (2000). The Commercialization of Human Body Parts: A Reappraisal From a Protestant Perspective. Christian Bioethics 6 (2):153-169.
J. S. Taylor (2009). Autonomy and Organ Sales, Revisited. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 34 (6):632-648.
James Stacey Taylor (2005). Autonomy Inducements and Organ Sales. In Nafsika Athanassoulis (ed.), Philosophical Reflections on Medical Ethics. Palgrave Macmillan.
Aaron Spital (2003). Conscription of Cadaveric Organs for Transplantation: Neglected Again. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 13 (2):169-174.
Michael P. Jaycox (2012). Coercion, Autonomy, and the Preferential Option for the Poor in the Ethics of Organ Transplantation. Developing World Bioethics 12 (3):135-147.
Benjamin E. Hippen (2005). In Defense of a Regulated Market in Kidneys From Living Vendors. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (6):593 – 626.
James Stacey Taylor (2002). Autonomy, Constraining Options, and Organ Sales. Journal of Applied Philosophy 19 (3):273–285.
Added to index2010-09-14
Total downloads25 ( #66,253 of 1,096,567 )
Recent downloads (6 months)9 ( #19,711 of 1,096,567 )
How can I increase my downloads?