David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
This article describes how historical claims frequently made in arguments about the propertization of copyright are incomplete, focusing on three examples: that intellectual property is a much older phrase than current scholarship would lead one to believe; that, regardless, copyright has been understood as property (literary, artistic, etc.) since the 18th century; that infringement of all sorts have generally been called piracy for at least that long; and that appeals to Thomas Jefferson for weaker intellectual property rights are misplaced for multiple reasons. Because copyright has been viewed as property for hundreds of years, scholars who connect the increasing strength of copyright to the rise of the phrase intellectual property must make an argument completely absent from the literature - that intellectual property somehow hypnotizes in a way that literary property or plain old property did not. The paper then turns to analysis of the propertization claims themselves, showing the limits of these arguments and suggesting directions in which this scholarship might go. Finally, the paper proposes that the actual reason commentators are increasingly uncomfortable with copyright as property is the boundaries problem - the fuzziness of a copyright's borders in a world where many more people are creating and recreating expression as their vocations and avocations. As more and more of us emigrate to the realm of expression, the demands for both expressive property and expressive space put tremendous pressure on the copyright system.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Shaheen E. Lakhan & Meenakshi K. Khurana (2008). Intellectual Property, Copyright, and Fair Use in Education. Cogprints.
Hugh Breakey (2010). User's Rights and the Public Domain. Intellectual Property Quarterly (3):312-23.
John W. Snapper (1999). On the Web, Plagiarism Matters More Than Copyright Piracy. Ethics and Information Technology 1 (2):127-135.
Wendy Mcelroy (2011). Contra Copyright, Again. Libertarian Papers 3.
Mark Alfino (1991). Intellectual Property and Copyright Ethics. Business and Professional Ethics Journal 10 (2):85-109.
Thomas M. Powers (2004). Ideas, Expressions, Universals, and Particulars: Metaphysics in the Realm of Software Copyright Law. In H. Tavani & R. Spinello (eds.), Intellectual Property Rights in a Networked World. Idea Group
Neil W. Netanel, Maharam of Padua V. Giustiniani: The Sixteenth-Century Origins of the Jewish Law of Copyright.
Sheila Slaughter & Gary Rhoades (2010). The Social Construction of Copyright Ethics and Values. Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (2):263-293.
Hugh Breakey (2009). Liberalism and Intellectual Property Rights. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 8 (3):329-349.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads16 ( #251,036 of 1,938,824 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #459,264 of 1,938,824 )
How can I increase my downloads?