Exploitation, Autonomy, and the Case for Organ Sales

Abstract A recent argument in favor of a free market in human organs claims that such a market enhances personal autonomy. I argue here that such a market would, on the contrary, actually compromise the autonomy of those most likely to sell their organs, namely, the least well off members of society. A Marxian-inspired notion of exploitation is deployed to show how, and in what sense, this is the case
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 5,705
External links
  • Through your library Configure

    Similar books and articles
    Paul M. Hughes (1998). Exploitation, Autonomy, and the Case for Organ Sales. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 12 (1):89--95.
    Paul M. Hughes (2006). Ambivalence, Autonomy, and Organ Sales. Southern Journal of Philosophy 44 (2):237-251.
    Paul McLaughlin (2008). The Ethics of Exploitation. Studia Philosophica Estonica 1:5-16.

    Analytics

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index

    2011-01-09

    Total downloads

    5 ( #160,483 of 549,196 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    2 ( #37,418 of 549,196 )

    How can I increase my downloads?


    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature


    Discussion
    Start a new thread
    Order:
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.

    Other forums