Is a thing just the sum of its parts?
Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 86:213-234 (1986)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,679 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesD. H. Sanford (2011). Can a Sum Change its Parts? Analysis 71 (2):235-239.
Robert Allen (2000). Identity and Becoming. Southern Journal of Philosophy 38 (4):527-548.
Ariel Meirav (2009). The Principle of Summation. Erkenntnis 71 (2):175 - 190.
Henry Laycock (2011). Every Sum or Parts Which Are Water is Water. Humana Mente 19 (1):41-55.
Eric T. Olson (2006). Temporal Parts and Timeless Parthood. Noûs 40 (4):738–752.
Eric T. Olson (2006). Temporal Parts and Timeless Parthood. Noûs 40 (4):738-752.
Achille C. Varzi (2009). Universalism Entails Extensionalism. Analysis 69 (4):599-604.
Jamie Morgan (2013). A Humanist Narrative Less Than the Sum of its Parts. Metascience 22 (1):111-113.
Eric T. Olson (1997). Dion's Foot. Journal of Philosophy 94 (5):260-265.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2011-01-04Total downloads11 ( #99,523 of 549,090 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,317 of 549,090 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
