Mr. Martin on the incarnation
Australasian Journal of Philosophy 40 (2):208 – 211 (1962)
| Abstract | THE AUTHOR, THOUGH CRITICAL OF MARTIN’S BOOK, "RELIGIOUS BELIEF", DEFENDS MARTIN FROM THE CRITICISMS OF ROWE AND PLANTINGA BECAUSE THE LATTER HAVE NOT "MADE THEIR CASE" IN CLAIMING THERE IS A CONTRADICTION INVOLVED IN THE ARGUMENT THAT CHRIST AND GOD ARE THE SAME. (STAFF) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,631 |
| External links |
|
| Through your library | Configure |
José Ignacio Cabezón (1999). Incarnation. Faith and Philosophy 16 (4):449-471.
Masumbuko Mununguri (1997). The Closeness of the God of Our Ancestors: An African Approach to the Incarnation. Marist International Centre.
Jonathan Kvanvig (2010). ``The Incarnation and the Knowability Paradox&Quot. Synthese 173 (1):89-105.
Alfred J. Freddoso (1986). Human Nature, Potency and the Incarnation. Faith and Philosophy 3 (1):27-53.
Alfred Freddoso (1986). Human Nature, Potency and the Incarnation. Faith and Philosophy 3 (1):27-53.
Christopher J. Martin (1998). The Logic of Growth: Twelfth-Century Nominalists and the Development of Theories of the Incarnation. Medieval Philosophy and Theology 7 (01).
Noel Sheth (2002). Hindu Avatāra and Christian Incarnation: A Comparison. Philosophy East and West 52 (1):98-125.
Richard Swinburne (2011). The Coherence of the Chalcedonian Definition of the Incarnation. In A. Marmodoro & J. Hill (eds.), The Metaphysics of the Incarnation. Oxford Up.
Brian Leftow (1995). Anselm on the Necessity of the Incarnation. Religious Studies 31 (2):167 - 185.
Anna Marmodoro & Jonathan Hill (eds.) (2011). The Metaphysics of the Incarnation. Oxford University Press, USA.
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads4 ( #178,434 of 548,973 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |

