Mirror symmetry: What is it for relational space to be orientable?

In Katherine Brading & Elena Castellani (eds.), Symmetries in Physics: Philosophical Reflections. Cambridge University Press. 281 (2003)
Abstract
As Pooley (2001) explains, the challenge of giving a relational account of orientability (and topology more generally) is not an easy one. This paper criticizes Pooley's and other proposals, raises a range of problems for the project, and then proposes a novel way for the relationist to understand not only topology, but also the geometry of space. This proposal is the `regularity account' since it claims that geometry and topology supervene on the regular ways in which relations evolve
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 9,357
External links
  •   Try with proxy.
  •   Try with proxy.
  • Through your library Configure
    References found in this work BETA

    No references found.

    Citations of this work BETA
    Jan-Willem Romeijn (2005). Enantiomorphy and Time. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 19 (2):167 – 190.
    Similar books and articles
    David Hilbert & Nick Huggett (2006). Groups in Mind. Philosophy of Science 73 (5):765-777.
    Nick Huggett & David R. Hilbert (2006). Groups in Mind. Philosophy of Science 73 (5):765-77.
    Simon Saunders (2007). Mirroring as an a Priori Symmetry. Philosophy of Science 74 (4):452-480.
    Adrian Heathcote (1988). Zeeman-Göbel Topologies. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 39 (2):247-261.
    C. Callender & R. Weingard (2000). Topology Change and the Unity of Space. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 31 (2):227-246.
    Carl Hoefer (2000). Kant's Hands and Earman's Pions: Chirality Arguments for Substantival Space. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 14 (3):237 – 256.
    Tim Maudlin (2010). Time, Topology and Physical Geometry. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 84 (1):63-78.
    Analytics

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index

    2009-04-09

    Total downloads

    12 ( #106,433 of 1,088,777 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    0

    How can I increase my downloads?

    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature


    Discussion
    Start a new thread
    Order:
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.