Null Sentences

Abstract In Tractatus, Wittgenstein held that there are null sentences – prominently including logical truths and the truths of mathematics. He says that such sentences are without sense (sinnlos), that they say nothing; he also denies that they are nonsensical (unsinning). Surely it is what a sentence says which is true or false. So if a sentence says nothing, how can it be true or false? The paper discusses the issue.
Keywords Wittgenstein  Tractatus  null sentences
Categories
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive
External links This entry has no external links. Add one.
Through your library Configure

Similar books and articles
Kevin Mulligan, Peter Simons & Barry Smith (1984). Truth-Makers. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 44 (3):287--321.
John Koethe (2003). On the 'Resolute' Reading of the Tractatus. Philosophical Investigations 26 (3):187–204.
Ryszard Zuber (1978). Analyticity and Genericness. Grazer Philosophische Studien 6:63-73.
Peter Milne (2007). On Godel Sentences and What They Say. Philosophia Mathematica 15 (2):193-226.

Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2011-02-28

Total downloads

17 ( #71,221 of 551,054 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

10 ( #6,964 of 551,054 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums