Tarski and Proper Classes

Analysis 40 (4):6-11 (1980)
Abstract
In this paper the authors argue that if Tarski’s definition of truth for the calculus of classes is correct, then set theories which assert the existence of proper classes (classes which are not the member of anything) are incorrect.
Keywords Tarski  sets  proper classes
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 9,357
External links
  •   Try with proxy.
  • Through your library Configure
    References found in this work BETA

    No references found.

    Citations of this work BETA

    No citations found.

    Similar books and articles
    John L. Bell (2000). Sets and Classes as Many. Journal of Philosophical Logic 29 (6):585-601.
    Timothy Bays (2001). On Tarski on Models. Journal of Symbolic Logic 66 (4):1701-1726.
    Richard Heck (1997). Tarski, Truth, and Semantics. Philosophical Review 106 (4):533-554.
    Analytics

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index

    2011-01-12

    Total downloads

    5 ( #178,728 of 1,088,404 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    1 ( #69,601 of 1,088,404 )

    How can I increase my downloads?

    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature


    Discussion
    Start a new thread
    Order:
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.