The Logic of Experimental Questions

The pair (A, Δ ), where A is a physical quantity (an observable) and Δ a subset of the reals, may be called an 'experimental question'. The set Q of experimental questions is, in classical mechanics, a Boolean algebra, and in quantum mechanics an orthomodular lattice (and also a transitive partial Boolean algebra). The question is raised: can we specify a priori what algebraic structure Q must have in any theory whatsoever? Several proposals suggesting that Q must be a lattice are discussed, and rejected in favor of the weak claim that Q must be a Boolean atlas.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 9,351
External links
  • Through your library Configure
    References found in this work BETA

    No references found.

    Citations of this work BETA

    No citations found.

    Similar books and articles
    Lars Hansen (2005). On an Algebra of Lattice-Valued Logic. Journal of Symbolic Logic 70 (1):282 - 318.
    Daniel D. Merrill (2005). Augustus De Morgan's Boolean Algebra. History and Philosophy of Logic 26 (2):75-91.
    Eduard Glas (1999). The Evolution of a Scientific Concept. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 30 (1):37-58.

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index


    Total downloads

    3 ( #223,982 of 1,088,400 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    1 ( #69,601 of 1,088,400 )

    How can I increase my downloads?

    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature

    Start a new thread
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.