Linguistics and Philosophy 16 (6):551 - 559 (1993)
|Abstract||The fact that a group of axioms use the word 'true' does not guarantee that that group of axioms yields a theory of truth. For Davidson the derivability of certain biconditionals from the axioms is what guarantees this. We argue that the test does not work. In particular, we argue that if the object language has truth-value gaps, the result of applying Davidson''s definition of a theory of truth is that no correct theory of truth for the language is possible.|
|Keywords||Davidson theories of truth truth-value gaps|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Philip Hugly & Charles Sayward (1993). The Disquotational Theory of Truth is False. Philosophia 22 (3-4):331-339.
Philip Hugly & Charles Sayward (1989). Are All Tautologies True? Logique Et Analyse 125:3-14.
Volker Halbach, Axiomatic Theories of Truth. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Philip Hugly & Charles Sayward (1992). Redundant Truth. Ratio 5 (1):24-37.
Ryan Christensen (2011). Theories and Theories of Truth. Metaphysica 12 (1):31-43.
Donald Davidson (2005). Truth and Predication. Harvard University Press.
Philip Hugly & Charles Sayward (1992). Classical Logic and Truth-Value Gaps. Philosophical Papers 21 (2):141-150.
Michael Morreau (1999). Supervaluation Can Leave Truth-Value Gaps After All. Journal of Philosophy 96 (3):148-156.
Patrick Greenough (2010). Deflationism and Truth-Value Gaps. In Nikolaj Pedersen & Cory D. Wright (eds.), New Waves inTruth. Palgrave Macmillan.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads49 ( #25,744 of 722,753 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #25,873 of 722,753 )
How can I increase my downloads?