Graduate studies at Western
Philosophia 16 (1):45-60 (1986)
|Abstract||The following syllogism is considered: a string is not an expression unless it is tokenable; no one can utter, write, or in anyway token an infinite string; so no infinite string is an expression. The second premise is rejected. But the tokenability of an infinite sentence is not sufficient for it being an infinite expression. A further condition is that no finite sentence expresses that sentence’s truth-conditions. So it is an open question whether English contains infinite expressions.|
|Keywords||strings token expression|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
M. G. F. Martin (2010). Getting on Top of Oneself: Comments on Self-Expression. Acta Analytica 25 (1):81-88.
Robert R. Williams (2010). Hegel's Concept of The True Infinite. The Owl of Minerva 42 (1-2):89-122.
Herman Cappelen & Ernie Lepore (1999). Using, Mentioning and Quoting: A Reply to Saka. Mind 108 (432):741-750.
Yaroslav D. Sergeyev (2008). A New Applied Approach for Executing Computations with Infinite and Infinitesimal Quantities. Informatica 19 (4):567-596.
Barbara K. Sain (2007). Expression in the Theo-Logic. Philosophy and Theology 19 (1/2):301-322.
Volker Halbach (1999). Disquotationalism and Infinite Conjunctions. Mind 108 (429):1-22.
Charles Sayward (1988). Is English Infinite? Philosophical Papers 17 (2):141-151.
Peter Vallentyne (1993). Utilitarianism and Infinite Utility. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 71 (2):212 – 217.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads9 ( #122,521 of 739,539 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,680 of 739,539 )
How can I increase my downloads?