David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy and Social Criticism 22 (4):45-69 (1996)
Heidegger formulates the artwork's origin in a movement against the false motion of portrayal and repetition. The term mimesis is employed in the present essay to describe this origin and the means by which truth 'happens', specifically when mimesis turns against itself as imitation. The movement of the artwork is considered within the following constellation: the concept of mimesis is examined in light of Heidegger's 'Origin' essay to illuminate the concept and the essay by placing both in relation to Adorno's aesthetics (especially the way mimesis figures there) as well as Kant's doctrine of the sublime- via Lyotard's Lessons on the Analytic of the Sublime. The movement of the artwork toward truth is presented as the movement of mimesis. Further, for both Heidegger and Adorno's accounts, the mimetic movement of the artwork parallels the movement of aesthetic judgment, especially as it is construed in regard to Kant's doctrine of the sublime. Key Words: aesthetic judgment .art theory . beauty . mimesis . the Sublime.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Kendall L. Walton (1990). Mimesis as Make-Believe: On the Foundations of the Representational Arts. Harvard University Press.
K. Gover (2008). The Overlooked Work of Art in “the Origin of the Work of Art”. International Philosophical Quarterly 48 (2):143-153.
James Magrini, The Origin of the Work of Art: Historicality, Temporality, and Destiny in Heidegger's Philosophy of the 1930s.
Andrea Rehberg (2009). The World and the Work of Art. Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 14 (1):131-142.
D. W. Lucas (1968). Mimesis Güron Sörbom: Mimesis and Art. Studies in the Origin and Early Development of an Aesthetic Vocabulary. Pp. 218. Stockholm: Svenska Bokförlaget, 1966. Paper, Kr. 42. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 18 (02):190-192.
James Magrini (2010). The Work of Art and Truth of Being as “Historical”: Reading Being and Time, “The Origin of the Work of Art,” and the “Turn” in Heidegger’s Philosophy of the 1930s. Philosophy Today 54 (4):346-363.
Daniel L. Tate (2008). Transforming Mimesis. Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 13 (1):185-208.
Dan Webb (2009). `If Adorno Isn't the Devil, It's Because He's a Jew': Lyotard's Misreading of Adorno Through Thomas Mann's Dr Faustus. Philosophy and Social Criticism 35 (5):517-531.
Bed P. Paudyal (2009). Mimesis in Adorno's Aesthetic Theory. Journal of Philosophy: A Cross-Disciplinary Inquiry 4 (8):1-10.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads88 ( #37,808 of 1,726,564 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #231,303 of 1,726,564 )
How can I increase my downloads?