Some proposals for the formation of matrimonial law: Impediments, consent, form, I
Heythrop Journal 7 (2):161–182 (1966)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,875 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesV. Paul Brassell (1965). Matrimonial Cruelty in Civil and Canon Law. Heythrop Journal 6 (1):46-54.
S. J. V. Paul Brassell (1965). Matrimonial Cruelty in Civil and Canon Law. Heythrop Journal 6 (1):46–54.
Brian Bix (2010). Contracts. In Franklin G. Miller & Alan Wertheimer (eds.), The Ethics of Consent: Theory and Practice. Oxford University Press.
Jonathan Witmer-Rich (2011). It's Good to Be Autonomous: Prospective Consent, Retrospective Consent, and the Foundation of Consent in the Criminal Law. Criminal Law and Philosophy 5 (3):377-398.
Deborah Bowman (2011). Informed Consent: A Primer for Clinical Practice. Cambridge University Press.
Judy Allen & Beverley Mcnamara (2011). Reconsidering the Value of Consent in Biobank Research. Bioethics 25 (3):155-166.
Peter D. Sozou, Sally Sheldon & Geraldine M. Hartshorne (2010). Consent Agreements for Cryopreserved Embryos: The Case for Choice. Journal of Medical Ethics 36 (4):230-233.
Sheila McLean (2010). Autonomy, Consent and the Law. Routledge-Cavendish.
Peter Huizing (1966). Some Proposals for the Formation of Matrimonial Law: Impediments, Consent, Form, II. Heythrop Journal 7 (3):269-286.
S. J. Peter Huizing (1966). Some Proposals for the Formation of Matrimonial Law: Impediments, Consent, Form, II. Heythrop Journal 7 (3):269–286.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads4 ( #180,404 of 556,837 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,847 of 556,837 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
