Contextual gaps: privacy issues on Facebook [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Ethics and Information Technology 13 (4):289-302 (2011)
Social networking sites like Facebook are rapidly gaining in popularity. At the same time, they seem to present significant privacy issues for their users. We analyze two of Facebooks’s more recent features, Applications and News Feed, from the perspective enabled by Helen Nissenbaum’s treatment of privacy as “contextual integrity.” Offline, privacy is mediated by highly granular social contexts. Online contexts, including social networking sites, lack much of this granularity. These contextual gaps are at the root of many of the sites’ privacy issues. Applications, which nearly invisibly shares not just a users’, but a user’s friends’ information with third parties, clearly violates standard norms of information flow. News Feed is a more complex case, because it involves not just questions of privacy, but also of program interface and of the meaning of “friendship” online. In both cases, many of the privacy issues on Facebook are primarily design issues, which could be ameliorated by an interface that made the flows of information more transparent to users
|Keywords||Internet Privacy Contextual integrity Social networking Facebook|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Philip Brey (2000). Disclosive Computer Ethics. Acm Sigcas Computers and Society 30 (4):10-16.
Andy Clark (2003). Natural-Born Cyborgs: Minds, Technologies and the Future of Human Intelligence. Oxford University Press.
Dean Cocking (2008). Plural Selves and Relational Identity: Intimacy and Privacy Online. In M. J. van den Joven & J. Weckert (eds.), Information Technology and Moral Philosophy. Cambridge University Press. 123--141.
Gordon Hull (2009). Overblocking Autonomy: The Case of Mandatory Library Filtering Software. [REVIEW] Continental Philosophy Review 42 (1):81-100.
Steve Matthews (2008). Identity and Information Technology. In Jeroen den Hoven John Weckervant (ed.), Moral Philosophy and Information Technology. Cambridge University Press. 142.
Citations of this work BETA
Kirsten Martin (2012). Information Technology and Privacy: Conceptual Muddles or Privacy Vacuums? [REVIEW] Ethics and Information Technology 14 (4):267-284.
Pak-Hang Wong (2013). Confucian Social Media: An Oxymoron? Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 12 (3):283-296.
Similar books and articles
Norman Mooradian (2009). The Importance of Privacy Revisited. Ethics and Information Technology 11 (3):163-174.
Darren Charters (2002). Electronic Monitoring and Privacy Issues in Business-Marketing: The Ethics of the Doubleclick Experience. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 35 (4):243 - 254.
Hanna Krasnova, Oliver Günther, Sarah Spiekermann & Ksenia Koroleva (2009). Privacy Concerns and Identity in Online Social Networks. Identity in the Information Society 2 (1):39-63.
Michael Nagenborg (2009). Designing Spheres of Informational Justice. Ethics and Information Technology 11 (3):175-179.
Kirsten E. Martin (2012). Diminished or Just Different? A Factorial Vignette Study of Privacy as a Social Contract. Journal of Business Ethics 111 (4):519-539.
Ferdinand David Schoeman (ed.) (1984). Philosophical Dimensions of Privacy: An Anthology. Cambridge University Press.
Michael Zimmer (2010). But the Data is Already Public: On the Ethics of Research in Facebook. Ethics and Information Technology 12 (4):313-325.
Dawn Jutla (2010). Layering Privacy on Operating Systems, Social Networks, and Other Platforms by Design. Identity in the Information Society 3 (2):319-341.
Added to index2009-07-02
Total downloads60 ( #31,413 of 1,679,341 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #33,661 of 1,679,341 )
How can I increase my downloads?