Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Genomic Inheritances: Disclosing Individual Research Results From Whole-Exome Sequencing to Deceased Participants' Relatives”

, , &
American Journal of Bioethics 12 (12):W9-W10 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

No abstract

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1080/15265161.2012.739836

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Genomic Inheritances: Disclosing Individual Research Results From Whole-Exome Sequencing to Deceased Participants' Relatives.Ben Chan, Flavia M. Facio, Haley Eidem, Sara Chandros Hull, Leslie G. Biesecker & Benjamin E. Berkman - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (10):1-8.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Disclosing Individual Genetic Results to Research Participants”: Defining Clinical Utility And Revisiting the Role of Relationships.Vardit Ravitsky & Benjamin S. Wilfond - 2006 - American Journal of Bioethics 6 (6):W10-W12.
Disclosing Individual Genetic Research Results to Deceased Participants' Relatives by Means of a Qualified Disclosure Policy.Annelien L. Bredenoord & Johannes Jm van Delden - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (10):10-12.
The Return of Results of Deceased Research Participants.Anne Marie Tassé - 2011 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (4):621-630.
Response to open Peer commentaries on “must research participants understand randomization?”.David Wendler - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (2):W1 – W2.
The $1000 Genome: Ethical and Legal Issues in Whole Genome Sequencing of Individuals. [REVIEW]John A. Robertson - 2003 - American Journal of Bioethics 3 (3):35-42.
An Unbiased Response to the Open Peer Commentaries on “Does Consent Bias Research?”.Mark A. Rothstein & Abigail B. Shoben - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics 13 (4):W1 - W4.
Undesirable implications of disclosing individual genetic results to research participants.Leslie A. Meltzer - 2006 - American Journal of Bioethics 6 (6):28 – 30.
Disclosing individual genetic results to research participants.Vardit Ravitsky & Benjamin S. Wilfond - 2006 - American Journal of Bioethics 6 (6):8 – 17.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Withdrawal of Nonfutile Life Support After Attempted Suicide”.Samuel M. Brown, C. Gregory Elliott & Robert Paine - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics: 13 (3):W3 - W5.
Taking our obligations to research participants seriously: Disclosing individual results of genetic research.Teri A. Manolio - 2006 - American Journal of Bioethics 6 (6):32 – 34.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “How to Do Research Fairly in an Unjust World”.Angela J. Ballantyne - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (6):4-6.
Undesirable implications of disclosing individual genetic results to research participants.Leslie Meltzer Henry - unknown
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Strangers at the Beachside: Research Ethics Consultation”.Mildred K. Cho, Sara L. Tobin, Henry T. Greely, Jennifer McCormick, Angie Boyce & David Magnus - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (3):4-6.
Response to open Peer commentaries on “justifying a presumption of restraint in animal biotechnology research”.Autumn Fiester - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (6):W1 – W2.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-12-07

Downloads
42 (#367,260)

6 months
6 (#506,019)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ben Chan
National Institutes of Health

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

View all 9 references / Add more references