Steven rose's alternative to ultra-darwinism

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):896-896 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Stephen Rose's formulation of evolutionary theory is too scattered and impressionistic to serve as a genuine alternative to ultra- Darwinism. In addition, he has muddied a distinction that is crucial to our understanding of evolutionary phenomenona – the distinction between homologies and homoplasies.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,221

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Darwinism.James Lennox - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Hierarchical approach to replication and selection.Alexei A. Sharov - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):905-906.
Lifelines: life beyond the gene.Steven Peter Russell Rose - 2003 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Genetic and biological determinants of psychological traits.Colin Martindale - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):897-898.
Autopoiesis and lifelines: The importance of origins.Evan Thompson & Francisco J. Varela - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):909-910.
Lifelines to a sinking cause.H. Dieter Steklis - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):907-909.
Selection and “freedom” in biology and psychology.Julian C. Leslie - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):897-897.
Rose's homeodynamic perspective is not an alternative to neo-darwinism.A. J. Wells - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):911-912.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
24 (#560,118)

6 months
3 (#439,386)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references