David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Biology and Philosophy 15 (1):61-91 (2000)
During the past hundred years or so, those scholars studying science have isolated themselves as much as possible from scientists as well as from workers in other disciplines who study science. The result of this effort is history of science, philosophy of science and sociology of science as separate disciplines. I argue in this paper that now is the time for these disciplinary boundaries to be lowered or at least made more permeable so that a unified discipline of Science Studies might emerge. I discuss representative problems that stand in the way of such an integration. These problems may seem so formidable in the abstract that no one in their right mind would waste their time trying to bring about a unified field of Science Studies. However, those of us who limit ourselves to the study of the biological sciences have already formed a society in which workers from all disciplines can share their expertise -- the International Society for the History, Philosophy and Social Studies of Science.
|Keywords||epistemological relativism history of science interdisciplinary philosophy of science positivism Science Studies social studies of scientific knowledge sociology of science Whiggism|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Oscar Moro Abadía (2008). Beyond the Whig History Interpretation of History: Lessons on 'Presentism' From Hélène Metzger. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 39 (2):194-201.
Oscar Moro Abadía (2011). Hermeneutical Contributions to the History of Science: Gadamer on 'Presentism'. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 42 (2):372-380.
Oscar Moro Abadía (2010). Connecting Historiographical Traditions. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 41 (1):105-108.
Similar books and articles
Roberto Festa (2005). On the Relations Between (Neo-Classical) Philosophy of Science and Logic. Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 83 (1):511-520.
Andy Pickering (1994). After Representation: Science Studies in the Performative Idiom. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:413 - 419.
Jane Maienschein (1994). Cutting Edges Cut Both Ways. Biology and Philosophy 9 (1):1-24.
E. Seguin (2000). Bloor, Latour, and the Field. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 31 (3):503-508.
Steve Fuller (2004). Philosophy, Rhetoric, and the End of Knowledge: A New Beginning for Science and Technology Studies. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
David M. Knight (1984). The History of Science in Britain: A Personal View. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 15 (2):343-353.
Steven Yearley (2005). Making Sense of Science: Understanding the Social Study of Science. Sage Publications.
Peter Galison & David J. Stump (eds.) (1996). The Disunity of Science: Boundaries, Contexts, and Power. Stanford University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads7 ( #203,584 of 1,413,175 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #153,719 of 1,413,175 )
How can I increase my downloads?