David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
In Steven M. Cahn (ed.), The Monist. Oxford University Press 112 (2009)
David Hume's Enquiry concerning Human Understanding is the definitive statement of the greatest philosopher in the English language. His arguments in support of reasoning from experience, and against the "sophistry and illusion"of religiously inspired philosophical fantasies, caused controversy in the eighteenth century and are strikingly relevant today, when faith and science continue to clash. The Enquiry considers the origin and processes of human thought, reaching the stark conclusion that we can have no ultimate understanding of the physical world, or indeed our own minds. In either sphere we must depend on instinctive learning from experience, recognizing our animal nature and the limits of reason. Hume's calm and open-minded skepticism thus aims to provide a new basis for science, liberating us from the "superstition" of false metaphysics and religion. His Enquiry remains one of the best introductions to the study of philosophy, and his edition places it in its historical and philosophical context.
|Keywords||Knowledge, Theory of|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$7.95 direct from Amazon Amazon page|
|Call number||B1481.M55 2007|
|ISBN(s)||9780199211586 0199211582 0486434443 9780486434445|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Massimo Pigliucci & Maarten Boudry (2013). Prove It! The Burden of Proof Game in Science Vs. Pseudoscience Disputes. Philosophia 42 (2):487-502.
Alison Gopnik (1993). How We Know Our Minds: The Illusion of First-Person Knowledge of Intentionality. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (1):1.
Jonathan Phillips & Alex Shaw (2014). Manipulating Morality: Third‐Party Intentions Alter Moral Judgments by Changing Causal Reasoning. Cognitive Science 38 (8):1320-1347.
A. Goldman (1993). The Psychology of Folk Psychology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (1):15-28.
Jessica M. Wilson (2010). What is Hume's Dictum, and Why Believe It? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 80 (3):595 - 637.
Similar books and articles
Tamás Demeter (2012). Liberty, Necessity and the Foundations of Hume's 'Science of Man'. History of the Human Sciences 25 (1):15-31.
Tom L. Beauchamp (ed.) (2006). David Hume: An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals: A Critical Edition. Clarendon Press.
R. J. K. (1984). Editorial Notes. Teaching Philosophy 7 (3):281-281.
Tom L. Beauchamp (ed.) (2006). David Hume: An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding: A Critical Edition. Clarendon Press.
Stephen Buckle (2001). Hume's Enlightenment Tract: The Unity and Purpose of an Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. Oxford University Press.
David Hume (2007). An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding and Other Writings. Cambridge University Press.
David Hume (2000). An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding: A Critical Edition. Oxford University Press.
Peter Millican (ed.) (2001). Reading Hume on Human Understanding: Essays on the First Enquiry. Oxford University Press.
J. P. Wright (2003). Hume's Enlightenment Tract: The Unity and Purpose of 'an Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding'. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 81 (3):434 – 436.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads80 ( #55,026 of 1,911,836 )
Recent downloads (6 months)12 ( #50,323 of 1,911,836 )
How can I increase my downloads?