David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Foundations of Science 1 (1):119-130 (1995)
I argue here for a number of ways that modern computational science requires a change in the way we represent the relationship between theory and applications. It requires a switch away from logical reconstruction of theories in order to take surface mathematical syntax seriously. In addition, syntactically different versions of the same theory have important differences for applications, and this shows that the semantic account of theories is inappropriate for some purposes. I also argue against formalist approaches in the philosophy of science and for a greater role for perceptual knowledge rather than propositional knowledge in scientific empiricism.
|Keywords||Computational science Theories Models Scientific instruments Syntax Semantics|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Ian Hacking (1983). Representing and Intervening: Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science. Cambridge University Press.
W. V. Quine (1969). Ontological Relativity and Other Essays. Columbia University Press.
Nelson Goodman (1978). Ways of Worldmaking. Harvester Press.
Rudolf Carnap (1947/1956). Meaning and Necessity. University of Chicago Press.
Michael Redhead (1987). Incompleteness, Nonlocality, and Realism: A Prolegomenon to the Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics. Oxford University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Eric Winsberg (2009). A Tale of Two Methods. Synthese 169 (3):575 - 592.
Robert W. P. Luk (2010). Understanding Scientific Study Via Process Modeling. Foundations of Science 15 (1):49-78.
Similar books and articles
Paul Thagard (1986). Computational Models in the Philosophy of Science. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1986:329 - 335.
James Ladyman (2000). What's Really Wrong with Constructive Empiricism? Van Fraassen and the Metaphysics of Modality. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51 (4):837-856.
Kathleen Okruhlik (2004). Logical Empiricism, Feminism, and Neurath's Auxiliary Motive. Hypatia 19 (1):48-72.
Michael Rescorla (2013). Against Structuralist Theories of Computational Implementation. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 64 (4):681-707.
Paul Humphreys (1990). Computer Simulations. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:497 - 506.
Paul Thagard (1998). Computation and the Philosophy of Science. In T. W. Bynum & J. Moor (eds.), The Digital Phoenix. Cambridge: Blackwell
Paul Thagard (2005). Review of Paul Humphreys, Extending Ourselves: Computational Science, Empiricism, and Scientific Method. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2005 (6).
Paul Bohan Broderick, Johannes Lenhard & Arnold Silverberg (2006). Dispositional Versus Epistemic Causality. Minds and Machines 16 (3).
A. Gupta (2006). Empiricism and Experience. Harvard University Press.
Mark Colyvan (2007). Mathematical Recreation Versus Mathematical Knowledge. In Mary Leng, Alexander Paseau & Michael D. Potter (eds.), Mathematical Knowledge. Oxford University Press 109--122.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads25 ( #118,948 of 1,725,237 )
Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #81,183 of 1,725,237 )
How can I increase my downloads?