David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):497-504 (2001)
We summarise and respond to the main points made by the commentators on our target article, which concern: (1) whether structural similarity can play a causal role in normal object identification and in neuropsychological deficits for living things, (2) the nature of our structural knowledge of the world, (3) the relations between sensory and functional knowledge of objects, and the nature of our functional knowledge about living things, (4) whether we need to posit a “core” semantic system, (5) arguments that can be marshalled from evidence on functional imaging, (6) the causal mechanisms by which category differences can emerge in object representations, and (7) the nature of our knowledge about categories other than living and nonliving things. We also highlight points raised in our article that seem to be accepted.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Koen Lamberts (2001). Category-Specific Deficits and Exemplar Models. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):484-485.
Keith R. Laws (2001). What is Structural Similarity and is It Greater in Living Things? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):486-487.
Bradford Mahon & Alfonso Caramazza (2001). The Sensory/Functional Assumption or the Data: Which Do We Keep? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):488-489.
H. Clark Barrett (2001). Is Category Specificity in the World or in the Mind? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):478-479.
E. C. Leek & E. M. Pothos (2001). What is Specific About Category Specificity? Fractionating Patterns of Impairments and the Spurious Living/Nonliving Dichotomy. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):487-488.
George S. Cree & Ken McRae (2001). Beyond the Sensory/Functional Dichotomy. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):480-481.
Agnesa Pillon & Dana Samson (2001). On Disentangling and Weighting Kinds of Semantic Knowledge. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):490-490.
Marc Thioux, Eva Turconi, Emanuelle Palmers & Xavier Seron (2001). About Numbers as a Semantic Category. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):494-495.
Glyn W. Humphreys & Emer M. E. Forde (2001). Hierarchies, Similarity, and Interactivity in Object Recognition: “Category-Specific” Neuropsychological Deficits. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):453-476.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads26 ( #117,489 of 1,726,249 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #231,316 of 1,726,249 )
How can I increase my downloads?