Emergence, not supervenience

Philosophy of Science Supplement 64 (4):337-45 (1997)
I argue that supervenience is an inadequate device for representing relations between different levels of phenomena. I then provide six criteria that emergent phenomena seem to satisfy. Using examples drawn from macroscopic physics, I suggest that such emergent features may well be quite common in the physical realm
Keywords Emergence  Model  Reductionism  Science  Supervenience
Categories (categorize this paper)
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 14,205
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Citations of this work BETA
D. Heard (2006). A New Problem for Ontological Emergence. Philosophical Quarterly 56 (222):55-62.
Robert Francescotti (2007). Emergence. Erkenntnis 67 (1):47 - 63.

View all 10 citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

302 ( #1,964 of 1,699,481 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

39 ( #14,130 of 1,699,481 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.