David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 4 (1):52 – 65 (2010)
This paper aims to provide an ethical assessment of the shooting of animals for sport. In particular, it discusses the use of partridges and pheasants for shooting. While opposition to hunting and shooting large wild mammals is strong, game birds have often taken a back seat in everyday animal welfare concerns. However, the practice of raising game birds for sport poses significant ethical issues. Most birds shot are raised in factory-farming conditions, and there is a considerable amount of evidence to show that these birds endure extensive suffering on these farms. Considering the fact that birds do have interests, including interests in life and not suffering, what are the ethical implications of using them for blood sports? Indeed, in the light of the suffering that game birds endure in factory farms, it may be that shooting such birds for sport is more morally problematic than other types of hunting and shooting which many people are often fiercely opposed to, for while it seems plausible to say that some animals may be harmed more by death than others (due to, say, their greater capacities), there may be harms that are worse than death (such as a life of intolerable suffering). The objective of this paper is to assess the ethics of shooting animals for sport, and in particular the practice of raising game birds for use in blood sports, by applying principles commonly used in ethics; specifically the principle of non-maleficence and equal consideration of (like) interests
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
David DeGrazia (1996). Taking Animals Seriously: Mental Life and Moral Status. Cambridge University Press.
Kenneth E. Goodpaster (1978). On Being Morally Considerable. Journal of Philosophy 75 (6):308-325.
Stephen R. L. Clark (1977). The Moral Status of Animals. Oxford University Press.
Robert Heeger & Frans W. A. Brom (2001). Intrinsic Value and Direct Duties: From Animal Ethics Towards Environmental Ethics? [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 14 (2):241-252.
Citations of this work BETA
Rebekah Humphreys (2014). The Argument From Existence, Blood-Sports, and 'Sport-Slaves'. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 27 (2):331-345.
Similar books and articles
E. C. Marchant (1915). The Beasts, Birds, and Bees of Vergil The Beasts, Birds, and Bees of Vergil. A Naturalist's Handbook to the Georgics. By T. F. Royds. Blackwell. 3s. 6d. Net. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 29 (05):148-149.
Leslie Irvine (2009). Filling the Ark: Animal Welfare in Disasters. Temple University Press.
A. W. Cambridge-Pickard (1937). Greek Birds A Glossary of Greek Birds, by D'Arcy Wentworth Thompson. Pp. Viii + 342; Many Engravings in Text. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1936. Buckram, 12s. 6d. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 51 (04):131-132.
F. Barbara Orlans (2000). The Injustice of Excluding Laboratory Rats, Mice, and Birds From the Animal Welfare Act. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 10 (3):229-238.
W. Geoffrey Arnott (1988). Aristophanes' Birds Alan H. Sommerstein: The Comedies of Aristophanes, Vol. 6: Birds (Edited with Translation and Notes). Pp. Xv + 311; 1 Plate. Warminster: Aris & Phillips, 1987. £18.75 (Paper, £8.25). [REVIEW] The Classical Review 38 (02):211-213.
R. Y. Tyrrell (1891). Merry's Edition of the Birds Aristophanes. The Birds. W. W. Merry, D.D., Rector of Lincoln College, Oxford. Clarendon Press. 1889. 3s. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 5 (07):309-.
V. G. Thomas (1997). The Environmental and Ethical Implications of Lead Shot Contamination of Rural Lands in North America. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 10 (1):41-54.
A. Dionys de Leeuw (1996). Contemplating the Interests of Fish: The Angler's Challenge. Environmental Ethics 18 (4):373-390.
Robert W. Loftin (1984). The Morality of Hunting. Environmental Ethics 6 (3):241-250.
Added to index2010-05-07
Total downloads37 ( #127,770 of 1,940,976 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #149,681 of 1,940,976 )
How can I increase my downloads?